UK Karting - Notice Board

Notice Board
Chat

Welcome to the Chat forum, for all general chit-chat. For 2-Stroke, 4-Stroke and General Karting questions please post in the relevant forum.

Tip: If you register you can customise the way messages are displayed.
Already registered? Log On to restore your preferences.

Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'Chris34' (03 Apr 2009 @ 9:09)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'crawford' (03 Apr 2009 @ 9:38)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'blobslosak' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:00)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'Gillard77' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:05)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'Tmoon' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:10)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'blobslosak' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:32)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'Gillard77' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:39)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'blobslosak' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:48)

Re: Hamilton might NOT get banned for the season by 'dynamax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:51)

Whitmarsh admits team told Lewis to lie by 'blobslosak' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:00)

Re: Whitmarsh admits team told Lewis to lie by 'tsp' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:25)

Re: Whitmarsh admits team told Lewis to lie by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:04)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'tsp' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:09)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'JamesD' (03 Apr 2009 @ 13:53)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'MrT' (03 Apr 2009 @ 14:32)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'SteveGraves' (03 Apr 2009 @ 18:38)

Re: Hamilton might get banned for the season by 'ADZ' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:27)

Shane Dave Ryan got sucked in by 'raceinstructor' (04 Apr 2009 @ 0:00)

Re: Shane Dave Ryan got sucked in by 'raceinstructor' (04 Apr 2009 @ 0:01)

Re: Shane Dave Ryan got sucked in by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (04 Apr 2009 @ 8:32)

Hamilton shot himself in the foot. by 'TeamKermit' (04 Apr 2009 @ 5:20)

The Great 'I am' by 'Tmoon' (04 Apr 2009 @ 12:01)

Tmoon by 'chriskasch' (04 Apr 2009 @ 12:57)

Re: Tmoon by 'Tmoon' (04 Apr 2009 @ 13:20)

Re: Hold on a minute by 'Chris34' (04 Apr 2009 @ 15:20)

Re: Hold on a minute by 'Tmoon' (04 Apr 2009 @ 15:50)

Re: Tmoon by 'Chris34' (04 Apr 2009 @ 16:34)

Re: Tmoon by 'DanCan' (04 Apr 2009 @ 18:02)

Re: Tmoon by 'Chris34' (04 Apr 2009 @ 19:04)

Re: Tmoon by 'DanCan' (04 Apr 2009 @ 19:50)

Re: Tmoon by 'TeamKermit' (04 Apr 2009 @ 21:19)

Re: Tmoon by 'gettingquicker' (04 Apr 2009 @ 22:08)

Re: Tmoon by 'DanCan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 8:42)

Re: Tmoon by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 9:03)

Re: Tmoon by 'Tmoon' (05 Apr 2009 @ 11:43)

Re: Tmoon by 'Chris34' (05 Apr 2009 @ 12:43)

Re: Tmoon by 'Hootsman' (05 Apr 2009 @ 18:02)

Re: Tmoon by 'Chris34' (05 Apr 2009 @ 22:54)

Sepang by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:11)

Re: Sepang by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:12)

Re: Sepang by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:19)

Re: Sepang by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:31)

Re: Sepang by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:36)

Re: Sepang by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 9:15)

Re: Sepang by 'blobslosak' (03 Apr 2009 @ 10:36)

Re: Sepang by 'Chris34' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:01)

Re: Sepang by 'blobslosak' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:08)

cameras work.......... by 'kudos' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:22)

and one for ITPRO by 'kudos' (03 Apr 2009 @ 0:13)

Re: cameras work.......... by 'SimonS' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:53)

Re: cameras work.......... by 'kudos' (05 Apr 2009 @ 0:32)

Poor old Kudos by 'itpro' (06 Apr 2009 @ 13:52)

Re: Poor old Kudos by 'kudos' (06 Apr 2009 @ 23:14)

Re: Poor old Kudos by 'itpro' (07 Apr 2009 @ 1:20)

Re: Poor old Kudos by 'kudos' (08 Apr 2009 @ 22:26)

How do you do it, Ian??? by 'vic' (09 Apr 2009 @ 12:53)

Re: How do you do it, Ian??? by 'kudos' (10 Apr 2009 @ 0:29)

Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'neilw60dad' (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:21)

Re: Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'alasdair' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:29)

Re: Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:56)

Re: Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:53)

Re: Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:00)

Re: Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:03)

Barrichello was tagged by 'michaelg36' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:11)

Re: Barrichello shunts without penilty by 'MrT' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:40)

great start for hamilton....not by 'cosgrove78' (02 Apr 2009 @ 9:56)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:09)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'NikG' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:17)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:23)

Chance would be a fine thing Paul by 'michaelg36' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:28)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'davidmc' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:28)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'chriskasch' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:47)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'davidmc' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:57)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:02)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'NikG' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:10)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:28)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'davidmc' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:30)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:33)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'chriskasch' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:38)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'davidmc' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:10)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'tsp' (02 Apr 2009 @ 14:57)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:05)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'windoesnot' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:11)

Full story by 'Gillard77' (02 Apr 2009 @ 13:26)

Re: Full story by 'MrT' (02 Apr 2009 @ 14:06)

Re: Full story by 'chriskasch' (02 Apr 2009 @ 14:15)

Radio Transcripts by 'Gillard77' (02 Apr 2009 @ 14:50)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:01)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:16)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'chriskasch' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:28)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:39)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'Gillard77' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:40)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'chriskasch' (02 Apr 2009 @ 16:08)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 16:24)

Re: FIA stewards statement by 'Tmoon' (02 Apr 2009 @ 16:35)

FIAT could still win by 'neilw60dad' (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:32)

Re: FIAT could still win by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:01)

Blob... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:04)

Re: Radio Transcripts but... by 'merv' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:03)

Re: Radio Transcripts but... by 'BanzaiBoy' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:42)

Re: Audio of the incident by 'richpudd2003' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:57)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'Aztech' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:34)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'blobslosak' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:52)

Re: great start for hamilton....not by 'Aztech' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:31)

April fools - people are ready these days by 'JulioGeordio' (01 Apr 2009 @ 12:36)

Re: April fools - people are ready these days by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:50)

Re: April fools - people are ready these days by 'boiracer43' (01 Apr 2009 @ 21:06)

Re: April fools - people are ready these days by 'MarkT' (01 Apr 2009 @ 21:42)

Re: April fools - people are ready these days by 'jnrblue91' (01 Apr 2009 @ 22:11)

Re: April fools - people are ready these days by 'LateBraker' (01 Apr 2009 @ 22:43)

Re: April fools - people are ready these days by 'JulioGeordio' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:17)

Hamilton switches to Brawn! by 'merv' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:05)

Re: Hamilton switches to Brawn! by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:27)

Re: Hamilton switches to Brawn! by 'HC64' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:31)

4 stroke karting is dangerous by 'John' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:14)

Re: 4 stroke karting is dangerous by 'richpudd2003' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:24)

Re: 4 stroke karting is dangerous by 'BrianP' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:26)

Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 9:04)

Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:14)

David by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:37)

Re: David by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 12:56)

Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:32)

Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 13:06)

This stuff is NOT complex! by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 15:54)

Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:11)

Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl by 'PaulMRotax' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:31)

Paul by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:52)

Re: Paul by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:19)

Re: Paul by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:15)

Re: Paul by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:22)

Re: Paul by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:23)

Re: Paul by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:33)

Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:41)

-John: still avoid the simple question itpro/tangl by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:47)

Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:35)

Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:54)

Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:59)

Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 22:45)

Re: That just sums it up Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 7:56)

Re: That just sums it up Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:24)

Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:17)

Re: Dan....... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:36)

Re: Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:07)

Try thinking about it Dan by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:58)

Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:24)

Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:26)

Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:39)

Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:51)

Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:07)

*sigh* by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:08)

Re: Excuse me Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:26)

Re: Excuse me Tangler by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:16)

Re: Typical ipro - no interest in facts or context by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:29)

Re: Dan....... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:38)

Re: Dan....... by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:38)

Re: Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:09)

Re: Dan....... by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:53)

Re: Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:09)

Re: Dan....... by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:35)

I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.... by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:50)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:06)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:35)

where are we with this? by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 23:08)

Re: where are we with this? by 'Booney' (01 Apr 2009 @ 23:29)

Re: where are we with this? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 7:40)

Ok...getting somewhere! Booney & Dan by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:17)

Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:47)

Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:13)

Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:36)

Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:57)

Re: Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:15)

Re: Tangler by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:26)

John by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:44)

Re: Tangler - well actually YES someone did die by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:41)

Re: Tangler - well actually YES someone did die by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:21)

For goodness sake Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:33)

John by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:38)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:10)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:50)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:08)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:12)

Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:30)

Re: Sorry I should have said.. by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:15)

Re: Sorry I should have said.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:53)

Re: So answer the question by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:59)

Re: So answer the question by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:13)

Gentlemen....I suggest you look here...... by 'QuickOldTimer' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:08)

Re: Gentlemen....I suggest you look here...... by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:37)

Re: Do be scientific by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:59)

Re: Do be scientific...get it right... by 'QuickOldTimer' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:04)

Re: Do be scientific...get it right... by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:15)

john.....ahem by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:47)

Re: er Tangler no by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:08)

John....you're arguing against yourself now! by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:27)

Re: no I'm not!!! by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:51)

Re: no I'm not!!! by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 16:00)

Re: Try logic tangler by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 17:32)

and i thought it was blue..... by 'Avago' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:43)

Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:49)

Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:00)

Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:39)

I really can't understand..... by 'vic' (02 Apr 2009 @ 13:01)

Re: Unfortunately vic by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 17:01)

John will do his BEST to avoid this BUT..... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:28)

Re: No he won't, put up or shut up by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:47)

Re: No he won't, put up or shut up by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:10)

One for the mix by 'Booney' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:24)

Re: One for the mix by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:55)

Re: One for the mix by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 7:59)

Re: One for the mix by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:59)

Re: One for the mix by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:17)

Re: One for the mix by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 16:10)

Re: One for the mix by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:00)

Accidents are NOT accidents because.... by 'Avago' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:56)

Re: Accidents are NOT accidents because.... by 'Booney' (03 Apr 2009 @ 17:33)

Re: Accidents are NOT accidents because.... by 'PaulMRotax' (04 Apr 2009 @ 14:02)

Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'vic' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:51)

Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 14:36)

Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'vic' (03 Apr 2009 @ 19:37)

Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:12)

Re: Telepathy or what! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:26)

Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:21)

Dan & John by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:56)

Re: And the conclusion... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:29)

The reason speed is made an issue by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:58)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:10)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:20)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:26)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:44)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:22)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:47)

Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'JohnClucas' (04 Apr 2009 @ 19:38)

Re: Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:37)

Re: Tangler by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:05)

Re: Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (04 Apr 2009 @ 12:42)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'QuickOldTimer' (04 Apr 2009 @ 14:19)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 0:01)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'TanglerTKM' (05 Apr 2009 @ 8:57)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 13:21)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'QuickOldTimer' (05 Apr 2009 @ 17:47)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'TanglerTKM' (05 Apr 2009 @ 18:38)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 20:05)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'JohnClucas' (05 Apr 2009 @ 21:28)

Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (06 Apr 2009 @ 7:24)

Re: and what about consistency in punishment by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:47)

Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:37)

Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'DevonHawker' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:48)

Anyone Remeber this... by 'Chriseybaby' (01 Apr 2009 @ 8:52)

G20 by 'kudos' (31 Mar 2009 @ 23:08)

Re: G20 by 'DevonHawker' (31 Mar 2009 @ 23:43)

Re: G20 by 'Tmoon' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:08)

Someone Check a Youtube Vid by 'Roblin' (31 Mar 2009 @ 18:17)

Re: Someone Check a Youtube Vid by 'upsburney' (31 Mar 2009 @ 18:42)

Re: Someone Check a Youtube Vid by 'Roblin' (31 Mar 2009 @ 19:22)

Re: Someone Check a Youtube Vid by 'upsburney' (31 Mar 2009 @ 21:23)

Interesting article about Sea levels by 'Gillard77' (31 Mar 2009 @ 11:36)

Re: Interesting article about Sea levels by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:10)

One ingredent..... by 'Tmoon' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:32)

snout in the trough by 'DavidG' (30 Mar 2009 @ 17:14)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (30 Mar 2009 @ 17:18)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DevonHawker' (30 Mar 2009 @ 17:31)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (30 Mar 2009 @ 17:39)

Re: snout in the trough by 'HC64' (30 Mar 2009 @ 23:39)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (30 Mar 2009 @ 23:58)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 0:35)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (31 Mar 2009 @ 0:57)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 2:28)

Re: snout in the trough by 'PaulMRotax' (31 Mar 2009 @ 8:35)

Re: snout in the trough by 'QuickOldTimer' (31 Mar 2009 @ 10:43)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DevonHawker' (31 Mar 2009 @ 11:08)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 11:53)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DevonHawker' (31 Mar 2009 @ 13:38)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 17:29)

Re: snout in the trough by 'richydehav' (31 Mar 2009 @ 18:39)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (31 Mar 2009 @ 19:08)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 2:13)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 9:51)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:43)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 12:03)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 16:03)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:09)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:32)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:50)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:19)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 2:01)

Re: snout in the trough by 'richydehav' (01 Apr 2009 @ 8:15)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:40)

Re: snout in the trough by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:53)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DavidG' (01 Apr 2009 @ 14:55)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 15:28)

Re: snout in the trough by 'QuickOldTimer' (01 Apr 2009 @ 16:08)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:22)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DavidG' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:53)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:27)

Re: Tiresome Turner by 'DavidG' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:23)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DevonHawker' (31 Mar 2009 @ 19:52)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 2:29)

Re: snout in the trough by 'DavidG' (31 Mar 2009 @ 17:49)

Re: snout in the trough by 'kudos' (31 Mar 2009 @ 22:38)

Re: snout in the trough by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 2:34)

a real true brit won by 'daveleeroth' (29 Mar 2009 @ 15:46)

Re: a real true brit won by 'RoadRat' (29 Mar 2009 @ 19:23)

Re: a real true brit won by 'kudos' (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:13)

Re: a real true brit won by 'FullCanRacer' (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:22)

Re: a real true brit won by 'alanrr' (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:56)

Re: a real true brit won by 'daveleeroth' (29 Mar 2009 @ 23:16)

Re: a real true brit won by 'Aztech' (29 Mar 2009 @ 23:43)

Re: a real true brit won by 'IainB' (30 Mar 2009 @ 8:18)

Silver spoon ! by 'Gillard77' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:09)

facts about lewis and jenson by 'frag10' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:13)

Re: facts about lewis and jenson by 'MattScott' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:46)

Re: facts about lewis and jenson by 'Gillard77' (30 Mar 2009 @ 15:04)

Re: facts about lewis and jenson by 'RoadRat' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:59)

Re: facts about lewis and jenson by 'NikG' (30 Mar 2009 @ 15:27)

Re: facts about lewis and jenson by 'RoadRat' (30 Mar 2009 @ 15:44)

Road Rat by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:17)

Re: Road Rat by 'RoadRat' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:23)

Re: Road Rat by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:30)

Nik by 'itpro' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:27)

Re: Nik by 'NikG' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:51)

Re: Nik by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 2:06)

Re: Nik by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:10)

Re: a real true brit won by 'daveleeroth' (29 Mar 2009 @ 23:18)

Re: a real true brit won by 'Newshound' (30 Mar 2009 @ 0:08)

Re: a real true brit won by 'NikG' (30 Mar 2009 @ 8:36)

Re: a real true brit won by 'kart300' (30 Mar 2009 @ 8:43)

Re: a real true brit won by 'PGB' (30 Mar 2009 @ 9:00)

Re: a real true brit won by 'archiebald' (30 Mar 2009 @ 9:05)

the brits won it all by 'MattScott' (30 Mar 2009 @ 9:18)

ere ere matt by 'frag10' (30 Mar 2009 @ 9:35)

Re: ere ere matt by 'Tmoon' (30 Mar 2009 @ 13:54)

Re: ere ere matt by 'PGB' (30 Mar 2009 @ 13:55)

rubens f3 by 'frag10' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:11)

Re: rubens f3 by 'itpro' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:28)

Re: rubens f3 by 'davidmc' (30 Mar 2009 @ 23:43)

Re: rubens f3 by 'BrianP' (31 Mar 2009 @ 11:20)

Re: rubens f3 by 'NikG' (31 Mar 2009 @ 12:12)

Re: rubens f3 by 'davidmc' (31 Mar 2009 @ 19:17)

Re: rubens f3 by 'NikG' (01 Apr 2009 @ 0:30)

Re: rubens f3 by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:03)

Daveleeroth by 'alanrr' (30 Mar 2009 @ 15:37)

whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one kno by 'tkmkart' (29 Mar 2009 @ 14:43)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'Cadet49Dad' (29 Mar 2009 @ 14:46)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'tkmkart' (29 Mar 2009 @ 14:53)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'ChrisAdams' (29 Mar 2009 @ 15:25)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'Cadet49Dad' (29 Mar 2009 @ 16:02)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'tkmkart' (29 Mar 2009 @ 16:08)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'Chris34' (29 Mar 2009 @ 16:42)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'NikG' (30 Mar 2009 @ 8:41)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'Tmoon' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:01)

Re: whats all this about extra 80bhp in f1 any one by 'Gillard77' (30 Mar 2009 @ 14:12)

So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoiler 1 by 'Chad' (29 Mar 2009 @ 8:50)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'richpudd2003' (29 Mar 2009 @ 8:55)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Farrang' (29 Mar 2009 @ 8:57)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'MarkT' (29 Mar 2009 @ 9:22)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Cadet49Dad' (29 Mar 2009 @ 10:51)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'max27' (29 Mar 2009 @ 11:02)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Farrang' (29 Mar 2009 @ 11:23)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Gillard77' (29 Mar 2009 @ 11:26)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Avago' (29 Mar 2009 @ 12:15)

max27 by 'BD' (29 Mar 2009 @ 12:28)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Oli' (29 Mar 2009 @ 12:38)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Gillard77' (29 Mar 2009 @ 13:13)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'ChrisAdams' (29 Mar 2009 @ 13:36)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'Cadet49Dad' (29 Mar 2009 @ 14:45)

Re: So,.... Fairytales can come true ? ..F 1 spoil by 'RoadRat' (29 Mar 2009 @ 19:13)

f1 reflects game by 'RossBaxter' (28 Mar 2009 @ 19:54)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'RossBaxter' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:11)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'Oli' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:18)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'Oli' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:22)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'richpudd2003' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:19)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'RossBaxter' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:26)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'Oli' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:38)

Re: f1 reflects game by 'DevonHawker' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:39)

Re: a PROPER reaction time test by 'richpudd2003' (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:45)

Re: f1 reflex game by 'DevonHawker' (28 Mar 2009 @ 21:31)

Re: f1 reflex game by 'PaulMRotax' (29 Mar 2009 @ 8:59)

Williams protest...... by 'merv' (28 Mar 2009 @ 12:02)

Re: Williams protest...... by 'archiebald' (28 Mar 2009 @ 14:12)

Re: Williams protest...... by 'archiebald' (28 Mar 2009 @ 14:14)

Re: Williams protest...... by 'DanCan' (28 Mar 2009 @ 15:30)

Quick F1 question by 'Scotto89' (28 Mar 2009 @ 9:29)

Re: Quick F1 question by 'Tmoon' (28 Mar 2009 @ 10:31)

Re: Quick F1 question by 'BigJoe' (28 Mar 2009 @ 11:12)

Re: Quick F1 question by 'carladingding' (28 Mar 2009 @ 14:32)

F1 2009 by 'richpudd2003' (27 Mar 2009 @ 6:13)

Re: F1 2009 by 'BrianP' (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:01)

Re: F1 2009 by 'colin' (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:37)

Re: F1 2009 by 'JamesD' (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:53)

Re: F1 2009 by 'Tmoon' (27 Mar 2009 @ 9:32)

Re: F1 2009 by 'itpro' (27 Mar 2009 @ 10:30)

Ian..how can you say... by 'merv' (27 Mar 2009 @ 12:29)

Re: Ian..how can you say... by 'itpro' (27 Mar 2009 @ 14:11)

Re: Ian..how can you say... by 'richpudd2003' (27 Mar 2009 @ 16:32)

Re: Ian..how can you say... by 'NikG' (27 Mar 2009 @ 16:38)

Re: Ian..how can you say... by 'richpudd2003' (27 Mar 2009 @ 16:44)

Re: Ian..how can you say... by 'NikG' (27 Mar 2009 @ 16:51)

Qually by 'richpudd2003' (28 Mar 2009 @ 6:42)

Re: Qually by 'richpudd2003' (28 Mar 2009 @ 7:03)

Re: Qually by 'MrT' (28 Mar 2009 @ 14:48)

Re: F1 2009 by 'merv' (27 Mar 2009 @ 12:19)

Re: F1 2009 by 'itpro' (27 Mar 2009 @ 12:25)

Ian.. by 'merv' (27 Mar 2009 @ 12:33)

Re: Ian.. by 'richpudd2003' (27 Mar 2009 @ 12:55)

Re: Ian.. by 'MattScott' (27 Mar 2009 @ 13:32)

Re: Matt... by 'merv' (27 Mar 2009 @ 13:45)

Re: Matt... by 'MattScott' (27 Mar 2009 @ 13:56)

Re: Matt... by 'itpro' (27 Mar 2009 @ 14:19)

Err..Ian..I did say.. by 'merv' (27 Mar 2009 @ 14:25)

Matt by 'itpro' (27 Mar 2009 @ 14:40)

Re: Matt by 'MattScott' (27 Mar 2009 @ 15:01)

Re: Matt by 'NikG' (27 Mar 2009 @ 16:36)

Ian by 'merv' (27 Mar 2009 @ 20:50)

Re: Merv by 'itpro' (27 Mar 2009 @ 23:44)

Re: Ian.. by 'JamesD' (27 Mar 2009 @ 15:51)

Politics by 'itpro' (26 Mar 2009 @ 18:26)

Re: Politics by 'Tbird' (27 Mar 2009 @ 0:48)

Wow! That`s a sharp political sword(nt) by 'JohnForce' (27 Mar 2009 @ 8:28)

Re: Wow! That`s a sharp political sword(nt) by 'Tmoon' (27 Mar 2009 @ 9:39)

Re: Wow! That`s a sharp political sword(nt) by 'Outlaw' (27 Mar 2009 @ 13:19)

Re: Wow! That`s a sharp political sword(nt) by 'JamesD' (27 Mar 2009 @ 16:14)

Re: Politics by 'kudos' (28 Mar 2009 @ 0:19)

Re: Politics by 'itpro' (28 Mar 2009 @ 16:12)

Re: Politics by 'MrT' (28 Mar 2009 @ 16:24)

Re: Politics by 'kudos' (28 Mar 2009 @ 22:32)

Re: Politics by 'kudos' (28 Mar 2009 @ 22:45)

Re: Politics by 'itpro' (30 Mar 2009 @ 17:34)

Re: Politics by 'itpro' (30 Mar 2009 @ 17:29)

Re: Politics by 'kudos' (31 Mar 2009 @ 23:16)

Bernies talking tough by 'Gillard77' (26 Mar 2009 @ 14:10)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'rpatrese' (26 Mar 2009 @ 14:18)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'Moonshine' (26 Mar 2009 @ 14:55)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'itpro' (26 Mar 2009 @ 15:29)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'SimonS' (26 Mar 2009 @ 20:25)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:26)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'JamesD' (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:58)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'Moonshine' (27 Mar 2009 @ 9:03)

Re: Bernies talking tough by 'Tmoon' (27 Mar 2009 @ 9:57)

Scrutineers pass protested diffusers by 'Gillard77' (26 Mar 2009 @ 13:03)

Re: Scrutineers pass protested diffusers by 'Scotto89' (26 Mar 2009 @ 16:48)

Re: Scrutineers pass protested diffusers by 'FullCanRacer' (27 Mar 2009 @ 0:14)

BUZZIN (Russ) Sense of humour!!! by 'CRGTony' (26 Mar 2009 @ 12:47)

Re: BUZZIN (Russ) Sense of humour!!! by 'michaelg36' (26 Mar 2009 @ 12:58)

Re: BUZZIN (Russ) Sense of humour!!! by 'MarkT' (26 Mar 2009 @ 13:02)

Clarkson getting stiched in a portaloo by 'pratty' (25 Mar 2009 @ 15:39)

Ian, re Mac wireless connection. by 'alanrr' (25 Mar 2009 @ 14:09)

Re: Ian, re Mac wireless connection. by 'itpro' (25 Mar 2009 @ 14:18)

Re: Ian, re Mac wireless connection. by 'alanrr' (25 Mar 2009 @ 14:52)

Re: Ian, re Mac wireless connection. by 'itpro' (25 Mar 2009 @ 16:17)

BBC showing historic Australian GP's !!!!!!!!!!!!! by 'singers' (25 Mar 2009 @ 11:21)

Re: BBC showing historic Australian GP's !!!!!!!!! by 'ghinzani' (25 Mar 2009 @ 13:22)

some drivers........ by 'tsp' (25 Mar 2009 @ 11:14)

Re: some drivers........ by 'Gillard77' (25 Mar 2009 @ 11:31)

e-mail address by 'DevonHawker' (23 Mar 2009 @ 14:09)

Re: e-mail address by 'Gillard77' (23 Mar 2009 @ 14:15)

Re: e-mail address by 'DevonHawker' (23 Mar 2009 @ 15:44)

Jump to page : 1 ... 61 62 63 64 - 65 - 66 67 68 69 ... 77

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links