UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Re: This engine builder was good
Posted by 'BilandRacer9' on 22 Aug 2014 @ 09:35


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
BilandRacer9
Joined: March 2005
Total Posts: 3
[ View User Profile ]
As with anything, one suits some circuits better than the other. For instance, I have found the TAG to be mighty around Clay, all due to the nature of the circuit. But then if you look at tracks like Sheni where they had super 1, DD's seemed to have the edge overall. I think in general like Chris says, it does balance out. I have found the 2 engines I have (one being an early 65** CNC barrel motor, and the other being a 20 odd year old 1 series!) are no different from each other around a power circuit like Clay, and have been regularly 2-3 tenths off the front runners, which to be honest is partly down to running at 160kg, but mostly because the front boys are just better/faster drivers! TKM does offer the best parity out there IMO, just a shame things are drying up!

Message Thread:

This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 0:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SLK'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 6:58)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 7:51)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 8:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SimonS'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:44)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by '3190'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:08)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:04)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'djcv8'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 17:22)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 18:06)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:56)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'iant'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:05)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:29)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'NikG'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:30)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'faster'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:27)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'alanrr'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 10:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 11:03)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 17:40)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 20:44)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 22:03)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:34)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 7:14)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 16:05)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:11)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 22:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 8:59)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BilandRacer9'  << You are here!
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 11:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 12:20)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'nitch'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'SLK'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 14:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 15:09)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (24 Aug 2014 @ 9:26)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 10:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PeterCliff'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 11:55)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:06)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:19)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 18:07)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 19:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 21:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 22:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (27 Aug 2014 @ 20:09)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: This engine builder was good"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk