UK Karting - Notice Board (Combined Forum) : Re: This engine builder was NOT good

Notice Board (Combined Forum)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good
Posted by 'SimonS' on 19 Aug 2014 @ 09:00

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

SimonSJoined: December 2004
Total Posts: 4
[ View User Profile ]

The difficulty is that the tuning game becomes very expensive once it has started.

To maintain that perfectly tuned engine you have to have the engine dynamically balanced at least at every service, because some of the parts will have been changed.

All the components will need machining, because dynamic balancing requires that the parts meet an exact weight (so it is additive as well as subtractive engineering)as well as an exact size.

Once a part can be machined, then substitution will take place. There are things one can do to a liner that make it 'better',

and the class becomes the playground of the very rich who can run an engine absolutely on its last bore, with the ports so close to the fiche that gas erosion will take them over the limit after a couple of meetings and so on.

Let's not forget the roots of the class, as a class where 'off the shelf' means that there is no advantage.

Let's face it,the suggestion of returning to the days of unlimited tuning, means the sport part has already been forgotten Basically, playing "wallet" in an 'economy' class isn't being sporting. There are wallet classes for wallet players, TKM is not meant to be one of them.

Message Thread:

This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 0:57)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'SLK' (19 Aug 2014 @ 6:58)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 7:51)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 8:33)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'SimonS' << You are here!

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:38)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:44)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by '3190' (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:08)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:34)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:04)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:11)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'djcv8' (19 Aug 2014 @ 17:22)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'KenH' (19 Aug 2014 @ 18:06)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:38)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:56)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'iant' (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:57)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'KenH' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:05)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:29)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:33)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'NikG' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:30)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'faster' (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:27)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:34)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'alanrr' (20 Aug 2014 @ 10:11)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (20 Aug 2014 @ 11:03)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'KenH' (20 Aug 2014 @ 17:40)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (20 Aug 2014 @ 20:44)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'davidmc' (20 Aug 2014 @ 22:03)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:08)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:34)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'gashead' (21 Aug 2014 @ 7:14)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (21 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'gashead' (21 Aug 2014 @ 16:05)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:11)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:38)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (21 Aug 2014 @ 22:21)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (22 Aug 2014 @ 8:59)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BilandRacer9' (22 Aug 2014 @ 9:35)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (22 Aug 2014 @ 11:57)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (22 Aug 2014 @ 12:20)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'dth07' (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:25)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'nitch' (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:38)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'SLK' (22 Aug 2014 @ 14:25)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (22 Aug 2014 @ 15:09)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'PaulMRotax' (24 Aug 2014 @ 9:26)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'daf75' (26 Aug 2014 @ 10:08)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'PeterCliff' (26 Aug 2014 @ 11:55)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'daf75' (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:06)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'PaulMRotax' (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:19)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (26 Aug 2014 @ 18:07)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'dth07' (26 Aug 2014 @ 19:46)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (26 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (26 Aug 2014 @ 21:57)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (26 Aug 2014 @ 22:46)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (27 Aug 2014 @ 20:09)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links