UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Re: This engine builder was NOT good
Posted by 'christkm' on 19 Aug 2014 @ 08:33


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
christkm
Joined: February 2013
Total Posts: 12
[ View User Profile ]
The rule presumably has a reason. If everyone machines their engines within a gnats whisker of the fiche, way beyond anything that would ever come from the factory, then the class will become more expensive. We've had a bit of criticism over TKM rules recently, rear bumpers, torsion bars and now engine mods. Those rules are all designed to keep costs down and the class has been around long enough to suggest there is some merit in that.

I agree though that nobody other than the builder and the customer knows what really happened hear so people shouldn't be too quick to condemn either.

Message Thread:

This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 0:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SLK'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 6:58)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 7:51)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'  << You are here!
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SimonS'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:44)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by '3190'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:08)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:04)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'djcv8'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 17:22)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 18:06)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:56)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'iant'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:05)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:29)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'NikG'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:30)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'faster'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:27)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'alanrr'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 10:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 11:03)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 17:40)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 20:44)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 22:03)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:34)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 7:14)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 16:05)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:11)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 22:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 8:59)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BilandRacer9'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 9:35)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 11:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 12:20)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'nitch'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'SLK'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 14:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 15:09)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (24 Aug 2014 @ 9:26)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 10:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PeterCliff'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 11:55)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:06)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:19)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 18:07)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 19:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 21:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 22:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (27 Aug 2014 @ 20:09)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: This engine builder was NOT good"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk