Notice Board (Chat) |
|
Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 9:04) Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'davidmc' (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:14) David by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:37) Re: David by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 12:56) Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:32) Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread. by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 13:06) This stuff is NOT complex! by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 15:54) Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:11) Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl by 'PaulMRotax' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:31) Paul by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:52) Re: Paul by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:19) Re: Paul by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:15) Re: Paul by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:22) Re: Paul by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:23) Re: Paul by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:33) Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl by 'JohnClucas' << You are here! -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/tangl by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:47) Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:35) Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:54) Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:59) Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 22:45) Re: That just sums it up Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 7:56) Re: That just sums it up Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:24) Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:17) Re: Dan....... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:36) Re: Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:07) Try thinking about it Dan by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:58) Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:24) Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:26) Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:39) Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:51) Re: ARE YOU thinking about it Tangler? by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:07) *sigh* by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:08) Re: Excuse me Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:26) Re: Excuse me Tangler by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:16) Re: Typical ipro - no interest in facts or context by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:29) Re: Dan....... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:38) Re: Dan....... by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:38) Re: Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:09) Re: Dan....... by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:53) Re: Dan....... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:09) Re: Dan....... by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:35) I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.... by 'itpro' (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:50) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'JohnClucas' (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:06) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:35) where are we with this? by 'TanglerTKM' (01 Apr 2009 @ 23:08) Re: where are we with this? by 'Booney' (01 Apr 2009 @ 23:29) Re: where are we with this? by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 7:40) Ok...getting somewhere! Booney & Dan by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:17) Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:47) Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:13) Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:36) Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!! by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:57) Re: Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:15) Re: Tangler by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:26) John by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:44) Re: Tangler - well actually YES someone did die by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:41) Re: Tangler - well actually YES someone did die by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:21) For goodness sake Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:33) John by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:38) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:10) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:50) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:08) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:12) Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:30) Re: Sorry I should have said.. by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:15) Re: Sorry I should have said.. by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:53) Re: So answer the question by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:59) Re: So answer the question by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:13) Gentlemen....I suggest you look here...... by 'QuickOldTimer' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:08) Re: Gentlemen....I suggest you look here...... by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:37) Re: Do be scientific by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:59) Re: Do be scientific...get it right... by 'QuickOldTimer' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:04) Re: Do be scientific...get it right... by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:15) john.....ahem by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:47) Re: er Tangler no by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:08) John....you're arguing against yourself now! by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:27) Re: no I'm not!!! by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:51) Re: no I'm not!!! by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 16:00) Re: Try logic tangler by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 17:32) and i thought it was blue..... by 'Avago' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:43) Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:49) Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:00) Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'PaulMRotax' (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:39) I really can't understand..... by 'vic' (02 Apr 2009 @ 13:01) Re: Unfortunately vic by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 17:01) John will do his BEST to avoid this BUT..... by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:28) Re: No he won't, put up or shut up by 'JohnClucas' (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:47) Re: No he won't, put up or shut up by 'itpro' (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:10) One for the mix by 'Booney' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:24) Re: One for the mix by 'TanglerTKM' (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:55) Re: One for the mix by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 7:59) Re: One for the mix by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:59) Re: One for the mix by 'PaulMRotax' (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:17) Re: One for the mix by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 16:10) Re: One for the mix by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:00) Accidents are NOT accidents because.... by 'Avago' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:56) Re: Accidents are NOT accidents because.... by 'Booney' (03 Apr 2009 @ 17:33) Re: Accidents are NOT accidents because.... by 'PaulMRotax' (04 Apr 2009 @ 14:02) Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'vic' (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:51) Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 14:36) Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'vic' (03 Apr 2009 @ 19:37) Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:12) Re: Telepathy or what! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:26) Re: Unfortunately vic.... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:21) Dan & John by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:56) Re: And the conclusion... by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:29) The reason speed is made an issue by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:58) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:10) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:20) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:26) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:44) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:22) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:47) Re: The reason speed is made an issue by 'JohnClucas' (04 Apr 2009 @ 19:38) Re: Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:37) Re: Tangler by 'TanglerTKM' (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:05) Re: Tangler by 'JohnClucas' (04 Apr 2009 @ 12:42) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'QuickOldTimer' (04 Apr 2009 @ 14:19) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 0:01) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'TanglerTKM' (05 Apr 2009 @ 8:57) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 13:21) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'QuickOldTimer' (05 Apr 2009 @ 17:47) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'TanglerTKM' (05 Apr 2009 @ 18:38) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (05 Apr 2009 @ 20:05) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'JohnClucas' (05 Apr 2009 @ 21:28) Re:Enforce the things that matter by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (06 Apr 2009 @ 7:24) Re: and what about consistency in punishment by 'JohnClucas' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:47) Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:37) Re: This stuff is NOT complex! by 'DevonHawker' (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:48) |
News | Karts & Karting |
Notice Board |
Market Place |
Companies Directory |
Tracks Directory |
Events Calendar |
Race Results |
Photo Gallery |
Links |
Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk |