UK Karting - Notice Board (Chat) : Re: Tangler (and also..to answer your question)

Notice Board (Chat)

Re: Tangler (and also..to answer your question)
Posted by 'TanglerTKM' on 15 Apr 2010 @ 17:32

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

TanglerTKMJoined: September 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

"if YOU were an insurance company and you KNEW that spotty-OIKS would cost you VASTLY more than geriatrics (like myself) AND that us geriatrics can get VERY cheap insurance from OTHER companies..... what would YOU do about the rates for spotty-OIKS and .... me?"

Well I'd raise the price for spotty oiks, (obviously). But what if there was a way for careful drivers who'd had no accidents to get a lower rate? As an insurance company I would have no interest in giving a significantly lower rate to such drivers (for a start, it would cut my profits and I'd have to raise prices for young drivers who have had accidents) but through regulation it is easily possible.

Note, that regulation isn't a bad thing, it would be a similar thing to what currently prevents insurance companies having a meeting between themselves and deciding to increase the prices for all drivers ten fold.

Message Thread:

quin direct going into administration by 'rich84' (13 Apr 2010 @ 14:32)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'DavyBoy' (13 Apr 2010 @ 15:35)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'rich84' (13 Apr 2010 @ 16:06)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'DavyBoy' (13 Apr 2010 @ 17:06)

Davy..... total TRIPE! by 'itpro' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:10)

itpro, not quite by 'michaelg36' (13 Apr 2010 @ 20:53)

Re: Davy..... total TRIPE! by 'PaulMRotax' (13 Apr 2010 @ 21:28)

Oh No Ian, Not TRIPE Ian... Not TRIPE at all ! by 'DavyBoy' (13 Apr 2010 @ 21:51)

Re: Oh No Ian, Not TRIPE Ian... Not TRIPE at all by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 0:04)

I haven't read most of this thread, but.... by 'alanrr' (14 Apr 2010 @ 0:38)

Re: I haven't read most of this thread, but.... by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 1:05)

...and the 'top hat' on it is as follows: by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 1:19)

...and the 'top hat' on it misses the point :-( by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 8:52)

Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:24)

Re: Davy by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:41)

experience by 'rich84' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:45)

Re: experience...... most amusing! by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:58)

Re: experience by 'SimonS' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:34)

Re: experience by '89cc' (14 Apr 2010 @ 12:16)

Re: experience by 'rich84' (14 Apr 2010 @ 13:58)

Re: experience by '89cc' (14 Apr 2010 @ 14:33)

Re: experience by '89cc' (14 Apr 2010 @ 14:37)

Re: Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:50)

OK. by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 12:45)

Persecution...... by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 12:55)

Re: Persecution...... by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 13:11)

Re: Persecution...... by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 14:44)

Re: Persecution...... by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:20)

Re: Persecution...... by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:31)

Re: Persecution...... by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:53)

Re: Persecution...... by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:03)

Re: Persecution...... by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:17)

Re: Persecution...... by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 17:00)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:08)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:20)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:09)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:21)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:24)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:35)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'DavyBoy' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:27)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'davidmc' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:31)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:37)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:52)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'davidmc' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:13)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:19)

Re: Persecution......Davy by 'davidmc' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:22)

I missed a bit..... by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:42)

...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'SimonS' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:19)

Simon by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:33)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:33)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:36)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:50)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'SimonS' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:43)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:56)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'brinjono' (14 Apr 2010 @ 14:29)

Re: ...and the 'top hat' on it hits the point :- by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 14:34)

Of course old people over forty have less..... by 'alanrr' (14 Apr 2010 @ 22:56)

Good old Alan...... by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 1:24)

Questions for you Ian ? by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 10:22)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 10:48)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 10:55)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:22)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:14)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:24)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:40)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:48)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 13:04)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 15:52)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 21:13)

Errrrr ...... Davy..... by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:34)

Re: Errrrr ...... Davy..... by 'DavyBoy' (16 Apr 2010 @ 17:21)

Re: Errrrr ...... Davy....errr... think it through by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 18:19)

Re: Errrrr ...... Davy....errr... think it through by 'DavyBoy' (16 Apr 2010 @ 20:01)

Re: Errrrr ...... Davy....errr... think it through by 'itpro' (19 Apr 2010 @ 11:44)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'QuickOldTimer' (15 Apr 2010 @ 22:17)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:35)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'alanrr' (15 Apr 2010 @ 22:52)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? Harv by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:34)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 10:54)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:11)

Davy by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:25)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'QuickOldTimer' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:34)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:48)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'QuickOldTimer' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:59)

Dave... by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 15:55)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 12:04)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'Gillard77' (15 Apr 2010 @ 12:28)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 12:31)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:00)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'Gillard77' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:12)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:24)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'Gillard77' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:50)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:05)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 15:57)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:33)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:53)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (16 Apr 2010 @ 9:00)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'Gillard77' (16 Apr 2010 @ 13:04)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'harvinsurrey' (16 Apr 2010 @ 13:12)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 16:22)

Re: Questions for you Ian ? by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 13:40)

Surely theres an easy solution? by 'TanglerTKM' (15 Apr 2010 @ 14:52)

Re: Surely theres an easy solution? by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 15:28)

Re: Surely theres an easy solution? by 'TanglerTKM' (15 Apr 2010 @ 15:40)

Tangler by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:10)

Ooops.... typo! by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:12)

Re: Ooops.... typo! by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:11)

Re: Tangler by 'TanglerTKM' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:14)

Re: Tangler by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:41)

Re: Tangler (and also..to answer your question) by 'TanglerTKM' << You are here!

Re: Tangler (and also..to answer your question) by 'Gillard77' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:43)

Re: Tangler (and also..to answer your question) by 'TanglerTKM' (15 Apr 2010 @ 18:09)

Re: Tangler (and also..to answer your question) by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:48)

Re: Tangler...... by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:47)

Re: Tangler...... by 'TanglerTKM' (16 Apr 2010 @ 1:21)

Re: Tangler...... by 'harvinsurrey' (16 Apr 2010 @ 9:04)

Re: Tangler...... by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 11:09)

Re: Tangler...... by 'harvinsurrey' (16 Apr 2010 @ 13:31)

Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'TanglerTKM' (16 Apr 2010 @ 14:22)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'harvinsurrey' (16 Apr 2010 @ 15:12)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 16:03)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'TanglerTKM' (16 Apr 2010 @ 16:49)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 17:03)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'TanglerTKM' (16 Apr 2010 @ 17:33)

Now who's being pedantic! by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 18:13)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'TanglerTKM' (16 Apr 2010 @ 19:06)

Re: Ian you're being pedantic again :P by 'itpro' (17 Apr 2010 @ 0:59)

Re: Good old Alan...... by 'alanrr' (15 Apr 2010 @ 21:45)

Re: Good old Alan...... by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 0:55)

continued by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 1:00)

Re: continued by 'alanrr' (17 Apr 2010 @ 21:49)

Re: continued by 'itpro' (19 Apr 2010 @ 20:43)

Re: continued by 'alanrr' (23 Apr 2010 @ 0:08)

Re: quin direct going into administration by '89cc' (13 Apr 2010 @ 16:06)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'rich84' (13 Apr 2010 @ 16:09)

Re: quin direct going into administration by '89cc' (13 Apr 2010 @ 16:13)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'jnrblue91' (13 Apr 2010 @ 16:40)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'FullCanRacer' (13 Apr 2010 @ 17:52)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'SAS' (13 Apr 2010 @ 17:57)

Re: quin direct going into administration by '89cc' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:58)

Full can........ by 'itpro' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:17)

Come on Rich........ tell us the truth.,.,.... by 'itpro' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:12)

Re: Come on Rich........ tell us the truth.,.,.... by 'mskart22' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:18)

Re: Come on Rich........ tell us the truth.,.,.... by 'itpro' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:23)

continued..... by 'itpro' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:33)

itpro by 'rich84' (13 Apr 2010 @ 19:50)

Re: itpro by 'mskart22' (13 Apr 2010 @ 20:42)

Re: itpro by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 0:27)

Here are some of the FACTS that you should know by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 0:53)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'rich84' (14 Apr 2010 @ 10:41)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:13)

Typo by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 11:14)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:18)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:35)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 15:44)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:00)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:10)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:16)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:27)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 17:21)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 18:07)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:45)

Re: Here are some of the FACTS that you should kno by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:50)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:06)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:11)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:40)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 16:59)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 17:17)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 17:32)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 18:09)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 18:19)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:21)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:39)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'itpro' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:50)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:55)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 21:29)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 11:13)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 16:19)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:05)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 1:08)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (16 Apr 2010 @ 9:37)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 19:58)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (14 Apr 2010 @ 20:09)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 20:14)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (14 Apr 2010 @ 21:35)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'itpro' (15 Apr 2010 @ 1:29)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'Doink' (15 Apr 2010 @ 9:12)

Re: quin direct going into administration by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 10:28)

what a beast of a thread by 'rich84' (15 Apr 2010 @ 14:30)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 15:24)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'Doink' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:06)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 17:54)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'Doink' (15 Apr 2010 @ 18:59)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'JoeKarter' (15 Apr 2010 @ 19:26)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 21:03)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'DavyBoy' (15 Apr 2010 @ 21:15)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 22:13)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'harvinsurrey' (15 Apr 2010 @ 22:16)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 1:12)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'DavyBoy' (16 Apr 2010 @ 8:11)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 12:13)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'DavyBoy' (16 Apr 2010 @ 17:39)

Davy.... a bit a 'OxyMoron' there! by 'itpro' (16 Apr 2010 @ 18:24)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'DavyBoy' (16 Apr 2010 @ 19:56)

Welll..... that's questionable..... by 'itpro' (17 Apr 2010 @ 1:10)

Re: what a beast of a thread by 'DavyBoy' (17 Apr 2010 @ 9:34)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links