Sounding desperate now, Doink, aren't you!
Forget the grammar; just try dealing with the CORRECT use of capital letters for names and the start of new sentences. Also, try leaving a space after a comma! That would be a good start!
I'd also suggest you try avoiding crossing swords with me on anything bar FACTS! I am stunned that you can't grasp the idea that the QUALITY of the data source MATTERS! If not, what would be the problem with using my 'Little Noddy' suggestion?
Perhaps you might learn to comprehend that the road sign to indicate a 'Black Spot' is NOT a Gatso Camera!
If you had any experience of that part of the M11 you MIGHT just know WHY there is a change of speed at that point and what would happen if it were NOT there! But... of course... that's beyond you! As, of course, is the concept that the income generated by camera fines isn't ALL 'profit'. Try to get your head round the idea of the cost of those 'cases' where the driver CHALLENGES the evidence and the sort of financial burden it places on the 'project'. Or are you one of those IMMENSELY dim people who believes that the 'costs' charged against the miscreant in court ARE actually a reflection of the ACTUAL cost of the case?
I live in hope of your enlightenment, Doink, but I don't hold my breath while waiting!
Ian
|
|