UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Hi Bod!
Posted by 'itpro' on 26 Oct 2009 @ 21:56


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
Nice of you to join in.

Thank you for your kind advice; it's the first time that ANYONE has ever said that in reply to any of my messages... however many there have been of them.

In a one word response to your question: Emphasis!

In a more ‘complete’ manner:

If my replies were emails or other types of 'WP' documents, I could underline, embolden, change font or even change the colour of the font. Please can you advise me how to 'emphasise' the words that I require WITHOUT those functions?

You see, I just have a suspicion that YOU use various means of 'emphasis'.... or do YOU avoid the use of the Exclamation mark... or the 'ellipses' (of which you will notice I am quite fond) or would you also count the use of THOSE as… and I quote: ‘very CONDESCENDING?' Surely, intelligent people like you and me can get the meaning of a sentence WITHOUT the condescending use of an exclamation mark? Many English scholars will tell you the use of the exclamation mark is merely a way of saying: ‘Oooh, look, I want you to notice that I just made a clever statement!’.

If using THOSE types of 'emphasiser' (if there is such a word) is acceptable to you, you can't object to the CONCEPT of emphasis in text. So... can you give me a clue of how to do it WITHOUT CAPITALS on THIS web site???

Oh... and I loved the sarcasm of creating that admonition of my writing style by copying it... no one has ever done THAT, either!

Hold on… wouldn’t ‘sarcasm’ also be an ‘unacceptable method of emphasis’, too? And you didn’t mind using THAT, did you?

Genuinely, kind regards.

Ian

Message Thread:

question time  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 1:18)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 2:33)
PR may be flawed but  by 'bt3962'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 6:01)
Re: PR may be flawed but  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:17)
Re: question time  by 'IainB'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:18)
Re: question time  by 'PhilD'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:21)
Re: question time  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:25)
Re: question time  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:44)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:05)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:18)
Re: question time  by 'SimonS'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:37)
Re: question time  by 'Chickenbone'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:16)
Re: question time  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:40)
i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'cosgrove78'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:57)
Cosgrove  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:10)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:12)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:50)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:55)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:05)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:11)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:19)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:39)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:47)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 10:09)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:17)
It was question time, but where were the....  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:02)
Re: It was question time, but where were the....  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:25)
Re: question time  by 'Ldriver'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:51)
Simon,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:03)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:19)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:34)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:01)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:15)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:32)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:35)
Re: Roadrat  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 13:28)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 9:51)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:04)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:24)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:27)
The BNP vote will probably go through the roof....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 15:07)
Re: The BNP vote will probably go through the roof  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 17:37)
Ian.  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: Ian.  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:45)
RoadRat  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 23:30)
A dangerous future?  by 'Kartingdad'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 2:23)
Karting Dad  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 13:46)
Why shout?  by 'Bod'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 20:00)
Re: Why shout?  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 21:15)
Hi Bod!  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:12)
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:13)
a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Chads'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 2:28)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 18:17)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 23:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 0:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 10:48)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Hi Bod!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk