UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




It was question time, but where were the....
Posted by 'alanrr' on 23 Oct 2009 @ 12:02


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
alanrr
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 491
[ View User Profile ]
....variety of questions that are usually asked?

IF the BBC had conducted the programme as it normally would,it wouldn't have turned into a circus with everyone attacking Nick Griffin and the resultant 300,000 hits on the BNP web site.

It appears to have been a Labour goverment instigated programme format to shift the spotlight OFF the shambolic labour government by their spin doctors.

NOW, people are visiting the BNP website to have a look.

I don't think Jack Straw emerged in a good light, and as for saying that Britain sustaining a 70 million population was not a reason for looking at our immigration policy was showing just how far this government is out of touch.

The highlight was the black man who pressurised Straw to answer his question.

The people of this country who are here, regardless of their religion or colour, ARE worried about the out of control immigration that stupid labour have allowed to rage out of contriol.

You could see the BNP getting votes from Jews, muslims, blacks and anyone else who is disatisfied with a government.

Extremist parties thrive when the people are not listened to and Labour isn't and doesn't listen.

They are the party of deadbeats.

Erasmus of Rotterdam said 'In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king', but that just doesn't work with Gordon the Moron, does it?

Incidentally, WHY is it a criminal offence to deny the holocaust?

Sometimes, no matter what overwhelming evidence you present to someone, they will not be swayed or convinced by it.

Should that be a reason to prosecute them?

I don't see a reason to imprison me if I say 'the holocaust never happened'.

It's an opinion, and right or wrong, surely I would be entitled to it.

The fact that they tried to goad Griffin into admitting the fact on television, just showed the extent to which they were desperate to discredit him and maybe get him out of the way.

Message Thread:

question time  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 1:18)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 2:33)
PR may be flawed but  by 'bt3962'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 6:01)
Re: PR may be flawed but  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:17)
Re: question time  by 'IainB'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:18)
Re: question time  by 'PhilD'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:21)
Re: question time  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:25)
Re: question time  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:44)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:05)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:18)
Re: question time  by 'SimonS'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:37)
Re: question time  by 'Chickenbone'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:16)
Re: question time  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:40)
i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'cosgrove78'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:57)
Cosgrove  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:10)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:12)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:50)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:55)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:05)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:11)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:19)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:39)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:47)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 10:09)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:17)
It was question time, but where were the....  by 'alanrr'  << You are here!
Re: It was question time, but where were the....  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:25)
Re: question time  by 'Ldriver'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:51)
Simon,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:03)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:19)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:34)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:01)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:15)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:32)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:35)
Re: Roadrat  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 13:28)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 9:51)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:04)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:24)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:27)
The BNP vote will probably go through the roof....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 15:07)
Re: The BNP vote will probably go through the roof  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 17:37)
Ian.  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: Ian.  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:45)
RoadRat  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 23:30)
A dangerous future?  by 'Kartingdad'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 2:23)
Karting Dad  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 13:46)
Why shout?  by 'Bod'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 20:00)
Re: Why shout?  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 21:15)
Hi Bod!  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 21:56)
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:12)
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:13)
a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Chads'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 2:28)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 18:17)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 23:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 0:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 10:48)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: It was question time, but where were the...."
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk