Yes Vic.... I DID notice the point.... and that WAS exactly MY point.
The complaint never seems to be that WHITE CHRISTIANS are biased against Muslims.... it's ALWAYS the Muslims (and others) get BLAMED for this (by the Daily Mail etc.).
As I said... I have REALLY yet to hear a SINGLE Muslim, Hindu, Sikh or WHATEVER complain about Christmas, Easter, Crucifixes, etc.. However, the Daily Mail attitude seems to be to BLAME the Muslims etc., for the problem. That is BIZARRE!
Damn it, the Christians STOLE those festivals from a MUCH earlier religion; Wicker! They have NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER to claim those 'festivals, anyway.
Damn it, DAMN it, DAMN IT!! Just look at the NAME of the Easter festival..... exactly WHAT 'Christian' word or meaning IS there to that word???
Absolutely NONE!
It's from the NAME of a 'pagan' goddess called 'Estre' (or 'Oestre') who was the goddess of Spring to the Anglo Saxons. The Germans (well, those people who BECAME the Germans) used the word 'Ostern', probably for the 'same' goddess.
Just like 'Christmas' it was STOLEN by the early Christians who simply subplanted THEIR festival on top of an EARLIER festival in an attempt to MASK it's TRUE meaning. For those who don't know, Christmas was placed where it was to HIDE/mask the celebration of the Winter Solstice (shortest day). That's EXACTLY the same reason that January 1st is 'placed' around the same time!
Ohhhh, I get SO cross about this that I am waffling off the subject....
What worries me SO much is that the 'white masses' (what ELSE can I call them?) are in danger of being whipped up by such BONKERS ideas when its NEVER HAS been the MAHORITY of the Muslims who live here who have CAUSED that problem.
Yes... the Abu Hamsas of this world WILL try to whip up hatred.... almost IDENTICALLY to the Christian NUTTER (Fred Phelps) who we has SUCCESFULLY banned from the country for EXACTLY parallel reasons!
Put brutally, you CANNOT trust religious people... period! They are simply DANGEROUS!
OPne of my FAVOURITE comments was made resecntly in a combined interview with Richard Dawkins and the Arch Bishop of Canterbury. The Bishop said HIS bit and Richard simply said:-
' Why should we listen to the Bishop JUST because he has an imaginary friend?'
...Way to GO... Richard!
Ian
|
|
