UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re:Itpro, outdated industries
Posted by 'itpro' on 01 Feb 2009 @ 18:06


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
More rubbish!

Piracy would have been at EXACTLY the same level, no matter WHAT the music industry had done moving to download formats! It's not the FORMATS that make people into pirates; it's the fact that they can STEAL it and not PAY for it!

If 'theft' was being to be AVOIDED by free-downloader, then all they had to do was to send a 'fee' to the music companies...... do you know of QUEUES of people doing taht.....?

The Video industry is the PERFECT example. The output has been available in 'downlaod' form for LONGER than it's been available in DIGITAL form..... it's called.... a TV! has that 'freely available, convenient' form STOPPED people from pirating TV shows......?

The same applies to MUSIC... it TOO has been available in 'down'load' form..... over the RADIO!

This tripe about 'availablity of download format' is just an EXCUSE for simple THEFT!

Ian

Message Thread:

£20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'Gillard77'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 10:23)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'Oli'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 10:38)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'dynamax'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 10:49)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'Cadet49Dad'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 12:48)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'kai'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 13:23)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'itpro'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 14:19)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'davidmc'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 14:58)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'itpro'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 15:38)
Cut the tax spend on...  by 'DavyBoy'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 16:03)
Re: Cut the tax spend on...  by 'DevonHawker'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 17:56)
Re: Cut the tax spend on...  by 'DavyBoy'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 18:24)
Re: Cut the tax spend on...  by 'DevonHawker'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 19:59)
Re: Cut the tax spend on...  by 'WillDendy87'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 20:52)
We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'DavyBoy'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 21:52)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'DevonHawker'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 22:21)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'WillDendy87'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 22:49)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'DevonHawker'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 23:28)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'WillDendy87'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 23:44)
Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 1:27)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 10:33)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'DevonHawker'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:13)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:17)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:27)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:34)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:51)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 10:37)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing?  by 'DavyBoy'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 10:51)
Are you THINKING about what you are writing ? No  by 'DavyBoy'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 10:46)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 11:29)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 11:43)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 11:58)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:09)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:14)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'davidmc'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:34)
Davidmc  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:38)
Re: Davidmc  by 'davidmc'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 12:55)
Re: Davidmc  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 13:03)
Re: Davidmc  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:15)
Re: Davidmc  by 'davidmc'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 15:12)
Er........ David  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:11)
Re: Er........ David  by 'davidmc'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:58)
Re: Er........ David  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 16:28)
Re: Er........ David  by 'davidmc'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 16:40)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:07)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:15)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:19)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:46)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 16:20)
Re: Are you THINKING about what you are writing ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 16:54)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'DevonHawker'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 2:06)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 11:38)
Re: We should encourage the rich to get richer  by 'WillDendy87'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 11:44)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'davidmc'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 13:04)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 14:01)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'DavyBoy'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 21:40)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'davidmc'   (01 Feb 2009 @ 20:16)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'DavidG'   (01 Feb 2009 @ 20:43)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'WillDendy87'   (01 Feb 2009 @ 21:26)
Re:Itpro, outdated industries  by 'davidmc'   (01 Feb 2009 @ 21:28)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'davidmc'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 13:35)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'chriskasch'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 14:30)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'itpro'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 15:40)
Re: £20 internet connection TAX planned  by 'chriskasch'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 16:03)
alterior motive here  by 'singers'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 14:57)
Re: alterior motive here  by 'itpro'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 15:41)
Its Ulterior not alterior [NT]  by 'DavyBoy'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 16:05)
Re: Its Ulterior not alterior [NT]  by 'itpro'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 19:34)
Re: Its Ulterior not alterior [NT]  by 'WillDendy87'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 20:58)
Re: Its Ulterior not alterior [NT]  by 'DavyBoy'   (30 Jan 2009 @ 21:41)
Re: Its Ulterior not alterior [NT]  by 'itpro'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 1:09)
back on topik...  by 'singers'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 3:31)
Re: back on topik...  by 'jnrblue91'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 20:44)
Re: back on topik... TOPIC !  by 'DevonHawker'   (31 Jan 2009 @ 22:44)
Re: back on topik... TOPIC !  by 'jnrblue91'   (02 Feb 2009 @ 20:22)
Re: back on topik... TOPIC !  by 'KenE'   (03 Feb 2009 @ 23:48)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re:Itpro, outdated industries"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk