UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: Nik G
Posted by 'Chris34' on 17 Jan 2009 @ 23:36


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
Chris34
Joined: November 2004
Total Posts: 51
[ View User Profile ]
The point I am trying to make is that the car companies haven't done hardly anything to come up with something different that could make them loads of money in the long run. IMO they should have mass produced a cheap electric vehicle that could do 70mph in under 7 seconds and looks cool like the mini or the smart (obviously not the same but something similar) and aimed it at city commuters who haven't got loads of money. If ford had done that they would have a vehicle that no one else was selling and that would mean they have a unique new market all to themselves with no competition leaving them in a more optimistic situation then they are in now.

It's no good making these types of cars for people with loads of money because they will always be able to afford the option of petrol/diesel or a greener, cheaper? fuel, which means they would be competing in the 'look what I've got' market rather than the 'how much will I save' market. Hybrid cars are just what it says on the label, in between market products so they don't appeal to the 'what can I save' market or the 'look what I've got' market and therefore are destined to be costly products that don't make very much money, if any at all.




Chris.

Message Thread:

Shouldn't we be pleased ..........................  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 15:58)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'singers'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:07)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:23)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'NikG'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:28)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:31)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'NikG'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 18:29)
Very definitely Not !  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 18:47)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 18:57)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 20:02)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 21:03)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'Chris34'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 22:17)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'DavyBoy'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 9:37)
Your'e so wrong!  by 'RoadRat'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 9:52)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:09)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'NikG'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:30)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:38)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'RoadRat'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:43)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'Chris34'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 14:44)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 16:45)
Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'DavyBoy'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 17:15)
Re: Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 17:37)
Re: Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'RoadRat'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 18:08)
Re: Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'DavyBoy'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 18:25)
Re: Ian  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 0:06)
Re: Ian  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 1:27)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'NikG'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 18:01)
Re: Nik G  by 'Chris34'  << You are here!
Re: Nik G  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 1:41)
Re: Nik G  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 2:51)
Re: Nik G  by 'RoadRat'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 8:32)
But this isn't why the car companies are failing  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 9:50)
Re: Nik and Ian and Daveyboy  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 10:45)
Re: Nik and Ian and Davyboy  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 11:53)
Re: Nik and Ian and Daveyboy  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 12:41)
Re: Nik your wrong  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 18:11)
Chris..... I am a gambling man!  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 18:22)
You're not listening...  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:20)
Re: Nik G  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 17:37)
Re: Nik G  by 'RoadRat'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 18:49)
Re: Nik G  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:06)
Re: Chris..... I am a gambling man!  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:30)
Re: Nik G  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:35)
Re: Nik G  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 21:24)
Re: Interesting reading and Nik G and Ian  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 22:54)
Re: Interesting reading and Nik G and Ian  by 'NikG'   (19 Jan 2009 @ 1:39)
Re: Nik G  by 'Chris34'   (19 Jan 2009 @ 2:39)
@Nik G  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Jan 2009 @ 9:09)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Nik G"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk