UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: cent spill for shot
Posted by 'itpro' on 12 Nov 2008 @ 12:13


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
There COULD be a 'mechanism' that 'caused' problems. The amount of dust put into the atmosphere by Krakatoa DID change our climate. Similarly, the Mount St Helens 'explosion' seemed to affect the climate in EXACTLY the same way, to a lesser extent! Remember, Krakatoa DWARFS the PATHETIC 'littleboy' bomb at Hiroshima. It was THIRTEEN THOUSAND TIMES more powerful!

Just so you know..... Krakatoa PULVERISED TWENTY ONE CUBIC KILOMETERS of rock into DUST and shoved THAT lot into the sky! Think about it........ that's a CUBE of rock that's MORE than 3 KILOMETERS along each FACE turned to dust....... that's a LOT of dust! Mount St Helens converted 5 cubic kilometers.

However, to show that the 'bomb's dust' had the same type of effect, you'd need to show at least FIVE things to SHOW that the 'bombs' had the effect you claim:-

1) that the bombs caused the same SORT of 'dust' scale as Krakatoa!
2) That the total of all OTHER 'human explosions' caused LESS dust than the nuclears! That would be tough to do when you see how much smoke and 'dust' was raised JUST by the firebombing of Tokyo and the destruction of Hamburg and Dresden on their OWN!
3) That the scale of 'additional' 'dust' was GREATER than man's dust production in OTHER things that we do..... like burning coal, diesel, oil, wood, etc. etc. and the level of dust created by simple things like ploughing and harvesting, etc..
4) You'd have to explain how the Krakatoa dust 'settled' out of the atmosphere in between 1 and 5 years but the dust from the 'bombs' is STILL hanging around up to FIFTY years later!
5) ......and this one is the KILLER...... The effect of Krakatoa was NOT to cause global WARMING but caused global COOLING! So severe was it that WE had the 'infamous' year of NO summer! It was NOT like this year...... it SNOWED in London THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE YEAR ! We had NO harvest AT ALL in that year! The Global temp fell by about 1.2 degrees (average) and it lasted (diminishing) for 5 years.

Good luck with the 'proof'!

Ian

Message Thread:

bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:47)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:53)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:27)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:11)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:32)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:51)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'davidmc'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:24)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:50)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:23)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:55)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:07)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:48)
nucular testing  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:18)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)
Re: nucular testing  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:14)
Re: nucular testing  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:17)
Re: nucular testing  by 'davidmc'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:06)
Re: nucular testing  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)
more evidence  by 'singers'   (08 Nov 2008 @ 11:54)
Re: more evidence  by 'Tmoon'   (08 Nov 2008 @ 15:30)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:38)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:50)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 13:22)
Re: nucular testing  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)
Re: nucular testing  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 15:16)
Hold the front page!  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:05)
Re: Hold the front page!  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:45)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:56)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:58)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:31)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 2:26)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:08)
By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!!  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:31)
Re: By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!!  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:35)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 13:40)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:23)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:27)
Re: nucular testing  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:35)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:57)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:02)
I think this has proved the point  by 'Canceric'   (08 Nov 2008 @ 22:07)
Re: I think this has proved the point  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)
Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic..  by 'Chad'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 22:52)
Re: Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic..  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:29)
Ian .go and buy a large mirror ...  by 'Chad'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 5:46)
alternative  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 9:56)
Tmoon  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:26)
Re: Tmoon  by 'davidmc'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:41)
David  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:47)
Re: Itpro  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:00)
RoadRat  by 'itpro'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 9:57)
ITPRO  by 'RoadRat'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:17)
Re: ITPRO  by 'itpro'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:25)
Re: Ian .go and buy a large mirror ...  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:10)
Sticks and stones ...  by 'Chad'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:16)
That DID make me laugh.....  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:30)
cent spill for shot  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:17)
concider this  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:08)
try this link  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)
Re: concider this  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)
Re: cent spill for shot  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
spilling betta now  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:27)
Re: spilling betta now  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)
Re: spilling betta now  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:15)
this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:26)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:53)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (13 Nov 2008 @ 10:03)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (13 Nov 2008 @ 19:17)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 2:08)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: cent spill for shot"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk