UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: that would be the Polar cusp then!
Posted by 'itpro' on 07 Nov 2008 @ 14:20


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
Oh yes you DID claim it! You also claimed to KNOW that it entered the Earth by the Poles! Simply STUNNING!

You did so on the 22nd October in the following words:-

"Alaska is a pivitol area on this planet in that, when material is brought in through ******
the South Pole it bounces and enters at the North Pole as well as some material
that "sneaks in" at the n.pole itself.."

.....and again in the 23rd:-

"....if you've been exposed to new theories on dark energy entering the atmosphere at the poles!...." ('EXPOSED'...... HA HA! you read PULLMAN'S BOOK!!!!!! And were CAUGHT OUT!)

And here's where you claimed that you UNDERSTOOD what dark Matter was and what it DID!:

"This dark matter is energy and it fuels storms"

Yeah.......... 'dark energy FUELS THE STORMS'...... in EXACTLY the way that Magic Pixey dust saves FAIRIES!

That's what you HATE isn't it? That I have MEMORY and am NOT phased by imbecilic 'New Age' Hippy ideas!

I am YOUR 'nightmare': a man who uses LOGIC and FACTS to show that tree-hugging CLAP TRAP for what it IS!!

Isn't it FUNNY how you try to forget parts of what YOU claimed when it SUIT you!

Ian

Message Thread:

this will effect the climate!  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:44)
please just read this  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 15:35)
Re: please just read this  by 'RoadRat'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:19)
Re: please just read this  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:41)
Re: this will effect the climate!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 16:31)
Re: this will effect the climate!  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:19)
Re: this will effect the climate!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:40)
Re: this will effect the climate! addendum  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)
Re: this will effect the climate! addendum  by 'daveleeroth'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 8:22)
Re: this will effect the climate! addendum  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 9:26)
Re: this will effect the climate! addendum  by 'RobWallace'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 18:48)
Re: this will effect the climate! addendum  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 19:27)
blah blah blah!  by 'singers'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 12:44)
Re: blah blah blah!  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 12:57)
Re: blah blah blah!  by 'carladingding'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 13:44)
Re: blah blah blah!  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 14:05)
Reasons to be cheerful - part 1  by 'Tmoon'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 15:38)
Re: Reasons to be cheerful - part 2  by 'Tmoon'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 15:45)
acrimoneous......lol  by 'singers'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:18)
Anyone want a good laugh.....?  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:46)
Re: acrimoneous......lol  by 'davidmc'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)
screw you and YOU!  by 'singers'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:44)
Ah...nice to see you....  by 'vic'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 21:59)
this is not cut and dried! how many times!  by 'singers'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 9:23)
Singers  by 'itpro'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 18:14)
Staggering!....Absolutely Staggering!  by 'vic'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:35)
acremoneous debate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'singers'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:47)
Re: Reasons to be cheerful - part 2  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:29)
hallelujah!  by 'singers'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:25)
Re: hallelujah!  by 'itpro'   (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)
part 3  by 'Tmoon'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 11:44)
wow!!  by 'Tmoon'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 11:56)
without tring to bored you.....  by 'Tmoon'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 15:22)
off onto another tangent......  by 'richpudd2003'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 16:23)
Re: part 3  by 'itpro'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 17:57)
Don't you think?  by 'Canceric'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 22:10)
Re: Don't you think?  by 'itpro'   (06 Nov 2008 @ 23:52)
shame you're such a  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:36)
Re: shame you're such a  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:58)
I was refering to the maunder minimum  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:47)
Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:02)
Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:16)
Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:06)
Re: shame you're such a  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:13)
Re: shame you're such a  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:24)
that would be the Polar cusp then!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:58)
see the spirals at the South Pole  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:09)
Re: see the spirals at the South Pole  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)
Re: that would be the Polar cusp then!  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
wrong!!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:38)
Re: wrong!!  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:35)
Re: wrong again!!!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:17)
Re: wrong again!!!....or....  by 'vic'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:26)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: that would be the Polar cusp then!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk