UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




you're BOTH wrong again!
Posted by 'singers' on 04 Nov 2008 @ 12:03


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
singers
Joined: April 2003
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
shame you're too blind and closed off.

there are NO sunspots today, so you are completely wrong!

are you blind, can you actually READ. YOU are getting confused not me! see the picture of the Sun here: again! : http://www.spaceweather.com/

see any sunspots do you!? do i need to post data from SOHO too!!!

we're are talking about cycle 24 idiot, stay awake!

no sunspots! only hydrogen. no CME. some flares.

I am not a Sun scientist or climatologist! HOW MANY TIMES! SO NOOOO! YOU DON'T FOLLOW ME!

I KNOW I KNOW ABOUT TELECOMS, POWER-KITING, SNOWBOARDING, BILANDS, F1 SO YOU SHOULD FOLLOW ME!

You DON'T look at all the facts! it would take you years to understand everything about the Sun! I listen and learn from the experts and post links on interesting theories to buck the trend!

it's not surprising you know nothing about the Sun if you believe in the IPCC report which had NO data on it.

IN EVERYTHING I POST I SAY: "SOME PEOPLE ARE SAYING......"

NONE OF IT COMES FROM ME!

IT'S THEORIES BASED ON THE LATEST NASA AND OTHER EMINENT BODIES' NEW DATA!

SO YOU ARE ACTUALLY DISRESPECTING THEM NOT ME!!!!



why won't you 2 pay attention for once:

1. i believe we MAY be entering a cooling phase
2. global warming is not caused by man

SCIENTIST, YES, PROPER SCIENTISTS!!!!!!!

....ARE INVESTIGATING E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G I HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT!

I WOULD NOT POST IT OTHERWISE!

Message Thread:

dark matter  by 'singers'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 16:14)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:17)
Re: dark matter  by 'kudos'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 1:21)
Re: dark matter  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 9:05)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)
Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 14:50)
Dark Matter  by 'Gillard77'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 15:03)
Re: Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 16:58)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:28)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:49)
Alf Garnett, lol  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:14)
Singers  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:36)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 18:14)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 19:03)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:12)
.... continued  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:20)
Re: .... continued  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:55)
Road Rat  by 'itpro'   (29 Oct 2008 @ 0:14)
why bother! falls on deaf ears!  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 16:28)
As you'd expect form Singers.....  by 'itpro'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 18:13)
same OLD same OLD  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:16)
Re: same OLD same OLD  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)
you don't half took rot  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:35)
Re: you don't half took rot  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)
SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 9:04)
Re: SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:22)
you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:47)
Re: you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:37)
Ha ha ha! Thats a good'un!  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 8:57)
Oh.... Vic, you ain't seen the NEXT one!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 10:39)
you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'singers'  << You are here!
Re: you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:48)
Singers.......  by 'vic'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:57)
Re: Singers.......  by 'brinjono'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:02)
nope!  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)
Re: nope!  by 'vic'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 13:22)
Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:51)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:53)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)
Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 1:30)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 15:25)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:57)
canceric  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:55)
Re: canceric  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:47)
Re: canceric  by 'mobilechicane'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 6:55)
mobilechicane  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)
Re: mobilechicane  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)
singers....  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 20:40)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: you're BOTH wrong again!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk