UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




As you'd expect form Singers.....
Posted by 'itpro' on 31 Oct 2008 @ 18:13


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
It's always the same

1) He states some LUDICROUS idea
2) We show him that it's TWADDLE
3) He then says 'you all don't understand me' and then spout MORE twaddle and we go round in circles!

The latest one is a CRACKER:-

"no amount of CO2 increases temperatures"

I'll just let THAT example of his UTTER TRIPE sink in..............

So.....if there was NO Co2 in our atmosphere, the temp would be the SAME........ would it?

Oh....... wouldn't Fourier, Tyndall and Arrenhuis be SHOCKED to find that their work on the subject in later 1800s was WRONG and that a telephone engineer knows MUCH more than THAY did!

Comic beyond belief!

When I read it, I had to go and FIND my eyebrows as they'd gone CLEAN off the top of my head! The DEPTH of Singer's ingnorance on this subject knows no bounds, does it????

Ibn case you ARE sane and you ARE interested...... it's generally agreed that the average 'surface' temperature across the whole globe is about 14 degrees Centigrade. It's also agreed that if ALL carbon dioxide 'disappeared', that average would drop to about -18 degrees centigrade. That's only a drop of THIRTY TWO DEGREES!! But........ Singers tells us it would make NO difference.........

Being honest with you, only an IMBECILE would make such a LUDICROUS suggestion........ hence Singers puts it forward as a 'serious' suggestion.........

I suppose if we carry ON this discussion, he'll move to more and more bizzare suggestions...... next it will be that GW is caused by excess earwax or some OTHER such total B*LL*CKS!

Ian

Message Thread:

dark matter  by 'singers'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 16:14)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:17)
Re: dark matter  by 'kudos'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 1:21)
Re: dark matter  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 9:05)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)
Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 14:50)
Dark Matter  by 'Gillard77'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 15:03)
Re: Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 16:58)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:28)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:49)
Alf Garnett, lol  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:14)
Singers  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:36)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 18:14)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 19:03)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:12)
.... continued  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:20)
Re: .... continued  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:55)
Road Rat  by 'itpro'   (29 Oct 2008 @ 0:14)
why bother! falls on deaf ears!  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 16:28)
As you'd expect form Singers.....  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
same OLD same OLD  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:16)
Re: same OLD same OLD  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)
you don't half took rot  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:35)
Re: you don't half took rot  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)
SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 9:04)
Re: SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:22)
you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:47)
Re: you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:37)
Ha ha ha! Thats a good'un!  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 8:57)
Oh.... Vic, you ain't seen the NEXT one!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 10:39)
you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:03)
Re: you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:48)
Singers.......  by 'vic'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:57)
Re: Singers.......  by 'brinjono'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:02)
nope!  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)
Re: nope!  by 'vic'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 13:22)
Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:51)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:53)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)
Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 1:30)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 15:25)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:57)
canceric  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:55)
Re: canceric  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:47)
Re: canceric  by 'mobilechicane'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 6:55)
mobilechicane  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)
Re: mobilechicane  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)
singers....  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 20:40)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: As you'd expect form Singers....."
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk