UK Karting - Notice Board (Chat) : Re: Hi Road Rat...... errr....... WHAT?????

Notice Board (Chat)

Re: Hi Road Rat...... errr....... WHAT?????
Posted by 'itpro' on 04 Oct 2008 @ 20:14

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

itproJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]

The rest MAY be opinion but your comment on Global Warming is UTTER B*LL*CKS!

100% of 'scientists' do NOT agree on it any more than 100% of 'scientists' accept that the world is NOT flat! (you'll note that there IS no DEFINITION' of whom we can CORRECTLY call 'scientists'!)

It's YOUR misunderstanding of science that's causing the confusion here and it is a PERFECT example of where YOU should not pontificate as you don't seem to grasp the MOST BASIC concept of 'science' ..... that it would be a DISASTER for ALL scientists to agree on ANYTHING!

Science ONLY 'moves forward' by testing EVERY assumption, even the ones we ASSUME to be true! A CLASSIC was the 2 guys who proved that Gastric Ulcers were NOT caused by 'stress' (which 'everybody KNEW' was the case)!

They PROVED that the cause was a BACTERIUM! Had '100% of scientists' agreed on the 'Stress' view (which you seem to to IMAGINE EVER happens!) then we would NEVER have found the cheap, effective and SUCCESSFUL cure!!!

Get that STRAIGHT...... 'science' M*U*S*T NEVER agree 100% on ANYTHING! Luckily, it never DOES happen!

However, the ONLY agreed approach of 'science' is to accept what the MJORITY (and it needs to be a VAST majority) accept and can PROVE until a BETTER proof to the contrary is provided which the MAJORITY need to agreed upon AGAIN!!

In THAT case, the REAL SCIENTIFIC ACCEPTANCE of Global Warming is as certain as any OTHER basic rule of science because 99% of the sientists working in THAT field of science have not an OUNCE of doubt that:-

1) Global Warming IS happening (but we're calling it 'CLIMATE CHANGE' to help the confused amongst you!)
2) That a SIGNIFICANT proportion of that change is 'man-triggered' (anthropogenic).

What a CLASSIC example for you to choose!

Secondly, your assumptions about the Nuclear industry have the same comic errors as your views on Global Warming! Any reading on the history and the STATISTICS would show you that you have V*A*S*T*L*Y more chance of being killed by a Tanker Driver or Coal Lorry driver delivering fuel to CONVENTIONAL power stations that you have of being killed or injured by a Nuclear Power plant! The evidence on THAT one is CLEAR and available for ALL to see! Even including Chernobyl, the figuresa are VASTLY better for the Nuclear industry than for the COAL industry! And I haven't even included those who died IN the mines or ON the gas/oil rigs!

The risks associated with ME discussing things which which I hardly understand (i.e., formula 1 drivers) compared to the risks of YOU discussing Global Warming and the Nuclear industries put me VASTLY in the 'advantage'. My views on F1 drivers risks NO ONES LIVES! Your views on the those two subjects are potentially LETHAL for you AND for me!

Ian

Message Thread:

Donkey by 'Tmoon' (29 Sep 2008 @ 10:34)

Incredible drive from Alonso... by 'merv' (29 Sep 2008 @ 11:29)

Re: Would Renault.... by 'blobslosak' (29 Sep 2008 @ 11:33)

Re: Would Renault.... by 'merv' (29 Sep 2008 @ 11:43)

Re: Would Renault.... by 'Tmoon' (29 Sep 2008 @ 11:56)

Tmoon...as a matter by 'merv' (29 Sep 2008 @ 12:33)

Re: Tmoon...as a matter by 'Tmoon' (29 Sep 2008 @ 14:51)

Re: Tmoon... by 'merv' (29 Sep 2008 @ 17:57)

Re: Tmoon... by 'jnrblue91' (29 Sep 2008 @ 21:05)

Re: Piquet crashed on purpose? by 'Chris34' (29 Sep 2008 @ 21:48)

Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 drivers by 'Chad' (29 Sep 2008 @ 22:58)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'itpro' (29 Sep 2008 @ 23:22)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'Chris34' (30 Sep 2008 @ 8:53)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'blobslosak' (30 Sep 2008 @ 9:08)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'itpro' (30 Sep 2008 @ 10:14)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'chriskasch' (30 Sep 2008 @ 11:22)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'itpro' (30 Sep 2008 @ 16:05)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'RoadRat' (30 Sep 2008 @ 16:31)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'chriskasch' (30 Sep 2008 @ 16:44)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'davidmc' (30 Sep 2008 @ 17:30)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'Chad' (01 Oct 2008 @ 1:55)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'itpro' (01 Oct 2008 @ 10:24)

Re: Alonso ..is definately one of the top 2 driver by 'RoadRat' (01 Oct 2008 @ 20:17)

Ian..the phrase i used was.. by 'Chad' (02 Oct 2008 @ 10:02)

Re: Ian..the phrase i used was.. by 'itpro' (02 Oct 2008 @ 22:15)

Re: Ian..the phrase i used was.. by 'RoadRat' (04 Oct 2008 @ 11:27)

Hi Road Rat? by 'itpro' (04 Oct 2008 @ 11:51)

Re: Hi Road Rat? by 'RoadRat' (04 Oct 2008 @ 17:48)

Re: Hi Road Rat...... errr....... WHAT????? by 'itpro' << You are here!

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.

This part of the thread has reached the maximum number of replies.
Please reply to one of the other messages within this thread, or if appropriate start a new thread.

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links