UK Karting - Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting) : If Atol's the solution... what was the problem ?

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)

If Atol's the solution... what was the problem ?
Posted by 'DavyBoy' on 26 Sep 2008 @ 20:18

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

DavyBoyJoined: July 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

For the impartial among us who've done comparative testing, it seems that the Atol fuel is inferior to pump fuel when it comes to engine power. However the reason it was introduced was to stop fuel cheating. So the question really is, how consistent is it ? After all, that's the purpose of a control fuel ? Are there independent assessments to confirm that ?

Of course it leads us back to the 'sledgehammer to crack a nut' approach to this issue. I still don't know why its not possible to prescribe pump fuel within a certain tolerance band and then test samples of drivers' fuel after an event to determine whether its compliant or not.

That would mean that all that was required was the test apparatus and somebody competent to be able to test it. In the event of a protest over a failed test, it could be later sent for forensic chemical analysis at a lab.

Message Thread:

Atol Fuel by 'NJB' (19 Sep 2008 @ 19:45)

Re: Atol Fuel by 'richydehav' (19 Sep 2008 @ 20:09)

Control fuel by 'DavyBoy' (19 Sep 2008 @ 20:47)

Re: Control fuel by 'RoadRat' (19 Sep 2008 @ 21:14)

Re: Control fuel by 'Tmoon' (20 Sep 2008 @ 9:41)

Re: Control fuel by 'alanrr' (20 Sep 2008 @ 21:50)

Re: Control fuel by 'bt3962' (21 Sep 2008 @ 5:54)

Re: Control fuel by 'raceinstructor' (21 Sep 2008 @ 8:00)

Re: Control fuel by 'Roblin' (21 Sep 2008 @ 9:04)

Re: Control fuel by 'DavyBoy' (21 Sep 2008 @ 11:21)

It's consistent! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:37)

Pump fuel doesn't provide the consistency by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:31)

ps forgot to tell you by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:35)

Re: ps forgot to tell you by 'richydehav' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:04)

Not really! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:43)

Re: Pump fuel doesn't provide the consistency by 'SSR' (22 Sep 2008 @ 17:30)

You seriously suggesting that Atol fill ALL...... by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 23:10)

Re: Pump fuel doesn't provide the consistency by 'bluetoo' (25 Sep 2008 @ 16:30)

Netto doesn't do fuel in Wimbourne! by 'SteveC' (23 Sep 2008 @ 11:49)

It's just you! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 14:16)

My understanding is that there is a....... by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 11:26)

Re: Fuel contracts by 'Graham S' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:11)

I keep forgetting! by 'SteveC' (22 Sep 2008 @ 12:40)

Performance advantage of fuel cheating ? by 'DavyBoy' (23 Sep 2008 @ 13:26)

Re: Performance advantage of fuel cheating ? by 'SteveC' (23 Sep 2008 @ 16:40)

Re: Performance advantage of fuel cheating ? by 'DavyBoy' (23 Sep 2008 @ 18:34)

We didn't have timing systems back when....... by 'SteveC' (23 Sep 2008 @ 19:10)

Forget additives for the moment. by 'DavyBoy' (23 Sep 2008 @ 19:28)

I haven't entered the other debate on...... by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 11:51)

There must be impartial evidence though... by 'DavyBoy' (24 Sep 2008 @ 13:46)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'RoadRat' (24 Sep 2008 @ 15:10)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 15:37)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'davidmc' (24 Sep 2008 @ 16:06)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 16:16)

Re: S1 entrants have to use Atol. by 'richydehav' (24 Sep 2008 @ 17:07)

re: njb ???????? by 'John' (24 Sep 2008 @ 17:39)

re: njb ???????? by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 17:44)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'davidmc' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:18)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 19:15)

I think that's a fair statement! by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:28)

Re: I think that's a fair statement! by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 19:41)

Not sure how quality of fuel can be tested on a... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 9:53)

Re: Not sure how quality of fuel can be tested on by 'NJB' (25 Sep 2008 @ 11:57)

Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 13:55)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'NJB' (25 Sep 2008 @ 16:55)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'broke' (25 Sep 2008 @ 17:30)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'richydehav' (25 Sep 2008 @ 18:16)

Some people don't agree with Neville! by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 19:27)

Re: Only in power output, not in quality of..... by 'bluetoo' (25 Sep 2008 @ 21:59)

But I suspect power output isn't how fuel Co's... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 19:25)

Re: But I suspect power output isn't how fuel Co's by 'NJB' (25 Sep 2008 @ 20:48)

But as we both know, dyno testing is only an..... by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 22:19)

Re: But as we both know, dyno testing is only an.. by 'davidmc' (26 Sep 2008 @ 0:41)

If Atol's the solution... what was the problem ? by 'DavyBoy' << You are here!

Impartial testing? by 'SteveC' (26 Sep 2008 @ 21:53)

Re: Impartial testing? by 'RoadRat' (27 Sep 2008 @ 8:25)

Impartial testing by 'DavyBoy' (28 Sep 2008 @ 9:04)

You still have a vested interest! by 'SteveC' (28 Sep 2008 @ 12:07)

Re: There must be impartial evidence though... by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:26)

To be fair back when we did it no! by 'SteveC' (24 Sep 2008 @ 18:25)

Tuners recommendations by 'NJB' (24 Sep 2008 @ 19:21)

John has some fuel to test! by 'SteveC' (25 Sep 2008 @ 10:46)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links