All points in prior posts are concise and falsifiable. Experimental data and real-world data back them up. I can provide as many sources as you'd like that agree with it. Whilst the mechanics of tyre performance are not well understood, the characteristics certainly are.
I fail to see how my opinion, expressed in considerably fewer words, with sources (more can be provided) and with the agreement of the wider racing community and physicists can be described as waffle whereas yours, with little more than "because I said so" stated in considerably more words is not.
For someone who so readily dismisses others opinions on matters such as climate change and road safety - citing scientific consensus and data as reasons for doing so - I find the hypocrisy of your last post baffling.
Nonetheless, it has been an enjoyable debate and I'm sure, were any of us to obtain conclusive data, we would post it for all to see. As already stated, in practice the conclusion to such a debate is of little consequence anyway.
|
|
