UK Karting - Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting) : Alan

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)

Alan
Posted by 'John' on 22 Apr 2009 @ 00:55

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

JohnJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

Alan,

Whilst I accept your account of what Vic Parrot said, it’s the way in which you, or Vic, said it that’s misleading.

The MSA have a duty through there officials to police this sport and ensure were they can, that the rules are complied with.

Here are the rules related to the new clutch as I currently understand them.

1. The kart must start to move with the driver seated when the engine revs are at no more than 3000rpm.

2. None of the parts of the clutch must be modified in any way.

3. The existence of oil or grease inside the clutch drum or on the clutch element is not in itself a reason for technical disqualification.

Now there is a world of difference between compliance with the three points above and “…….following a directive from the MSA, they would not be examining clutches” which is a total abdication of the MSA responsibly as described in the Blue Book.

Message Thread:

Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'alanrr' (21 Apr 2009 @ 17:50)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'paul40' (21 Apr 2009 @ 18:30)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'JonWright' (21 Apr 2009 @ 19:04)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'NikG' (21 Apr 2009 @ 19:21)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'paul40' (21 Apr 2009 @ 19:25)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'NikG' (21 Apr 2009 @ 19:31)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'dave56' (21 Apr 2009 @ 20:14)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'John' (21 Apr 2009 @ 20:44)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'Los' (21 Apr 2009 @ 21:49)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'Cadet49Dad' (21 Apr 2009 @ 21:58)

Re: Rotax clutches, Cadet49 Dad by 'John' (21 Apr 2009 @ 22:07)

Re: Rotax clutches, Cadet49 Dad by 'alanrr' (21 Apr 2009 @ 22:19)

Re: Rotax clutches, Cadet49 Dad by 'Cadet49Dad' (22 Apr 2009 @ 18:40)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'twiglet' (21 Apr 2009 @ 22:16)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'NikG' (21 Apr 2009 @ 23:10)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'am007' (21 Apr 2009 @ 23:19)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'Maverick73' (22 Apr 2009 @ 17:19)

Can anyone explain why the clutch to slip?? by 'gregjersey' (21 Apr 2009 @ 23:16)

Re: Can anyone explain why the clutch to slip?? by 'michaelg36' (21 Apr 2009 @ 23:17)

Re: Can anyone explain why the clutch to slip?? by 'alanrr' (21 Apr 2009 @ 23:28)

Alan by 'John' << You are here!

Re: Alan by 'PaulMRotax' (22 Apr 2009 @ 8:44)

Re: Alan by 'NikG' (22 Apr 2009 @ 8:53)

Sliipy clutches new vrs old by 'pratty' (22 Apr 2009 @ 8:54)

Re: Sliipy clutches new vrs old by 'bigp' (22 Apr 2009 @ 9:15)

Clutches, some facts by 'grizzle' (22 Apr 2009 @ 9:15)

Re: Clutches, some facts by 'John' (22 Apr 2009 @ 9:59)

Re: Clutches, some facts by 'AndySkingley' (22 Apr 2009 @ 14:09)

Re: Clutches, some facts by 'John' (22 Apr 2009 @ 14:46)

Re: Clutches, some facts by 'iant' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:04)

Re: Clutches, some facts by 'MattScott' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:13)

john by 'chriskasch' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:22)

Re: john by 'John' (22 Apr 2009 @ 22:54)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'Moonshine' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:22)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'KevinW' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:33)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'blobslosak' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:46)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'MattScott' (22 Apr 2009 @ 15:57)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'blobslosak' (22 Apr 2009 @ 16:00)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'buzzinrussell' (22 Apr 2009 @ 16:02)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'MattScott' (22 Apr 2009 @ 16:18)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'John' (22 Apr 2009 @ 22:51)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'buzzinrussell' (23 Apr 2009 @ 0:30)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'chriskasch' (23 Apr 2009 @ 0:31)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'NikG' (23 Apr 2009 @ 0:39)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'DavyBoy' (23 Apr 2009 @ 9:13)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'davidmc' (23 Apr 2009 @ 12:54)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'BigJohn' (23 Apr 2009 @ 13:20)

Re: and TKM is a more logical...... by 'huxley' (23 Apr 2009 @ 20:35)

Re: Rotax clutches, the ongoing saga. by 'dave15' (23 Apr 2009 @ 19:15)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links