UK Karting

Notice Board (General Karting)




Re: This engine builder was good
Posted by 'Liam' on 21 Aug 2014 @ 17:38


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
Liam
Joined: March 2010
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
We don't see so many TAG engines in the north, but I can't say I've felt at any disadvantage when one has been running this year. We were told the newer V-Clutch non-TAG engines were uncompetitive compared with DD, but again, if I'm off the pace I find it really hard to say it's the engine (unless it's my slower one ;) ). V-Clutch non-TAG were 1st and 2nd at Hooton Park last weekend - I know one of them was un-machined and within fiche, and I'm pretty confident the other one would have been.

TKM have good parity of engines in my opinion. Unfortunately it's easy to think if someones quicker than you at the end of the straight it has to be down to the engine. I've found more pace from concentrating on how I enter the corner before that straight than I'd ever get from a tiny bit more power.

Liam

Message Thread:

This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 0:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SLK'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 6:58)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 7:51)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 8:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SimonS'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:44)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by '3190'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:08)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:04)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'djcv8'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 17:22)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 18:06)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:56)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'iant'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:05)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:29)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'NikG'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:30)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'faster'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:27)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'alanrr'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 10:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 11:03)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 17:40)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 20:44)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 22:03)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:34)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 7:14)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 16:05)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:11)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'  << You are here!
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 22:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 8:59)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BilandRacer9'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 9:35)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 11:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 12:20)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'nitch'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'SLK'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 14:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 15:09)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (24 Aug 2014 @ 9:26)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 10:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PeterCliff'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 11:55)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:06)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:19)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 18:07)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 19:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 21:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 22:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (27 Aug 2014 @ 20:09)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: This engine builder was good"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk