UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Re: This engine builder was good
Posted by 'christkm' on 20 Aug 2014 @ 23:34


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
christkm
Joined: February 2013
Total Posts: 12
[ View User Profile ]
A lot of ifs and mights in there. Rotax killed a lot of classes. Plenty of people are competing well on cast barrels. I don't see any evidence that CNC are significantly better. Yes the process helped tal ko to machine to finer tolerances so there's less variance but that's probably it. You'll get less bad CNC motors than cast because the manufacturing process was improved.

2 popular classes that use proper kart engines, produced to fine tolerances (relative to moped and generator engines). These 2 classes are widely renowned to have the best engine parity. Neither allow machining of the engines. I'll leave this one there.

Message Thread:

This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 0:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SLK'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 6:58)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 7:51)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 8:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'SimonS'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:44)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by '3190'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:08)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:04)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'djcv8'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 17:22)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 18:06)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:38)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:56)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'iant'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:57)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:05)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:29)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:33)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'NikG'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:30)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'faster'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:27)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:34)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'alanrr'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 10:11)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'christkm'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 11:03)
Re: This engine builder was NOT good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 17:40)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 20:44)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 22:03)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'  << You are here!
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 7:14)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'gashead'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 16:05)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:11)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (21 Aug 2014 @ 22:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 8:59)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BilandRacer9'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 9:35)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 11:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'christkm'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 12:20)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'nitch'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:38)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'SLK'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 14:25)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (22 Aug 2014 @ 15:09)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (24 Aug 2014 @ 9:26)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 10:08)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PeterCliff'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 11:55)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'daf75'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:06)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'PaulMRotax'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:19)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 18:07)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'dth07'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 19:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 21:57)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'KenH'   (26 Aug 2014 @ 22:46)
Re: This engine builder was good  by 'Liam'   (27 Aug 2014 @ 20:09)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: This engine builder was good"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk