UK Karting - Notice Board (Combined Forum) : Re: This engine builder was NOT good

Notice Board (Combined Forum)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good
Posted by 'christkm' on 19 Aug 2014 @ 12:00

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

christkmJoined: February 2013
Total Posts: 12
[ View User Profile ]

No you won't get the same rolling off the production line as they leave a margin between their tolerance and the fiche. Therefore the fiche leaves an extra margin to allow for wear. If you machine right up to the fiche then the engine will wear beyond it very quickly.

The torsion bar rule prevents excessive time and money spent on testing infinite bar configurations to suit every condition at every circuit. Same with camber caster. The class has stood the test of time, ok it's suffered in relation to rotax but it survived where others didn't. There are other classes if you want more freedom to modify and spend.

Message Thread:

This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 0:57)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'SLK' (19 Aug 2014 @ 6:58)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 7:51)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 8:33)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'SimonS' (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:00)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:38)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 9:44)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by '3190' (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:08)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 11:34)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' << You are here!

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:04)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 13:11)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'djcv8' (19 Aug 2014 @ 17:22)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'KenH' (19 Aug 2014 @ 18:06)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:38)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:56)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'iant' (19 Aug 2014 @ 19:57)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'KenH' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:05)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:29)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:33)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'NikG' (19 Aug 2014 @ 20:30)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'faster' (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:27)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'BanzaiBoy' (19 Aug 2014 @ 22:34)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'alanrr' (20 Aug 2014 @ 10:11)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'christkm' (20 Aug 2014 @ 11:03)

Re: This engine builder was NOT good by 'KenH' (20 Aug 2014 @ 17:40)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (20 Aug 2014 @ 20:44)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'davidmc' (20 Aug 2014 @ 22:03)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:08)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (20 Aug 2014 @ 23:34)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'gashead' (21 Aug 2014 @ 7:14)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (21 Aug 2014 @ 12:00)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'gashead' (21 Aug 2014 @ 16:05)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:11)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (21 Aug 2014 @ 17:38)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (21 Aug 2014 @ 22:21)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (22 Aug 2014 @ 8:59)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BilandRacer9' (22 Aug 2014 @ 9:35)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (22 Aug 2014 @ 11:57)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'christkm' (22 Aug 2014 @ 12:20)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'dth07' (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:25)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'nitch' (22 Aug 2014 @ 13:38)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'SLK' (22 Aug 2014 @ 14:25)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (22 Aug 2014 @ 15:09)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'PaulMRotax' (24 Aug 2014 @ 9:26)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'daf75' (26 Aug 2014 @ 10:08)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'PeterCliff' (26 Aug 2014 @ 11:55)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'daf75' (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:06)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'PaulMRotax' (26 Aug 2014 @ 12:19)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (26 Aug 2014 @ 18:07)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'dth07' (26 Aug 2014 @ 19:46)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'BanzaiBoy' (26 Aug 2014 @ 20:21)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (26 Aug 2014 @ 21:57)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'KenH' (26 Aug 2014 @ 22:46)

Re: This engine builder was good by 'Liam' (27 Aug 2014 @ 20:09)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links