UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Re: Your'e so wrong!
Posted by 'NikG' on 17 Jan 2009 @ 18:01


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
NikG
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
Chris, you're living in a bit of a dream world with regards to electric cars. You physically can't fit enough batteries into a smart to get more then 80miles to a charge (which takes 6hours). They are just too big and heavy, and in Lithium Ion's case, dangerous too.

Even if batteries only cost £5k, thats significantly more then a petrol or diesel engine costs to manufacturer. The Smart ForTwo only costs £6k altogether!

I'm at loss to understand why you think electricity would not increase in price if everyone started plugging there cars in as well and solar farms, in the UK!

I don't disagree with you that the future is electric cars (in some guise). But the future is not here yet. Public opinion is shifting but it isn't ready for fully electric mainstream cars, even if they were great. It has to be a gradual change, from mild hybrids, to full blown hybrids to series hybrids to full electric cars. Other then the prius (which is series-parallel) we are currently entering the mild hybrid period and we're seeing concepts of series hybrids (GM Volt).

Anyway the future is unlikely to be full electric battery. Oil companies want you to continue buying from forecourts so hydrogen fuel cells will win that war. But on a positive note, according my project supervisor (we are working on a fuel cell bus) 20,000 wind generators would be enough to create the hydrogen necessary to power all of britains cars if they all went fuel cell.

Message Thread:

Shouldn't we be pleased ..........................  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 15:58)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'singers'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:07)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:23)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'NikG'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:28)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 17:31)
Re: Shouldn't we be pleased ......................  by 'NikG'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 18:29)
Very definitely Not !  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 18:47)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 18:57)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 20:02)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'RoadRat'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 21:03)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'Chris34'   (16 Jan 2009 @ 22:17)
Re: Very definitely Not !  by 'DavyBoy'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 9:37)
Your'e so wrong!  by 'RoadRat'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 9:52)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:09)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'NikG'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:30)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:38)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'RoadRat'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 11:43)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'Chris34'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 14:44)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 16:45)
Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'DavyBoy'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 17:15)
Re: Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'itpro'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 17:37)
Re: Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'RoadRat'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 18:08)
Re: Its nothing to do with 'greenness'  by 'DavyBoy'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 18:25)
Re: Ian  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 0:06)
Re: Ian  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 1:27)
Re: Your'e so wrong!  by 'NikG'  << You are here!
Re: Nik G  by 'Chris34'   (17 Jan 2009 @ 23:36)
Re: Nik G  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 1:41)
Re: Nik G  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 2:51)
Re: Nik G  by 'RoadRat'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 8:32)
But this isn't why the car companies are failing  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 9:50)
Re: Nik and Ian and Daveyboy  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 10:45)
Re: Nik and Ian and Davyboy  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 11:53)
Re: Nik and Ian and Daveyboy  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 12:41)
Re: Nik your wrong  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 18:11)
Chris..... I am a gambling man!  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 18:22)
You're not listening...  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:20)
Re: Nik G  by 'itpro'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 17:37)
Re: Nik G  by 'RoadRat'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 18:49)
Re: Nik G  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:06)
Re: Chris..... I am a gambling man!  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:30)
Re: Nik G  by 'DavyBoy'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 20:35)
Re: Nik G  by 'NikG'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 21:24)
Re: Interesting reading and Nik G and Ian  by 'Chris34'   (18 Jan 2009 @ 22:54)
Re: Interesting reading and Nik G and Ian  by 'NikG'   (19 Jan 2009 @ 1:39)
Re: Nik G  by 'Chris34'   (19 Jan 2009 @ 2:39)
@Nik G  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Jan 2009 @ 9:09)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Your'e so wrong!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk