UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Spot on Itpro.
Posted by 'raceinstructor' on 22 Nov 2008 @ 08:09


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
raceinstructor
Joined: August 2007
Total Posts: 2
[ View User Profile ]
The previous thread had reached it's limit.....

Yes that is exactly what I mean. We all,on occasions overstep the mark a little or are forced to use the area outside the white lines due to circumstances beyond our control which must be accepted as part of racing. The rules is very clear on this. 'The area outside the circuit boundary lines and must only be used in order to avoid contact or an accident' the Blue Book also says that any competitor leaving the 'circuit' (the surface denoted by the white lines) more than twice during the course of a race or qualifying session shall be liable to exclusion or loss of lap times.
How much clearer can it be? The only legal line is one that employs the WHOLE circuit as licensed not the several meters shorter version adopted by the rule & chassis benders.
Unfortunately the problem will persist until clerks take action or we go back to the dim and distant past where circuits had tyre bundles as track markers, try running over those then!!!
The whole issue of kerb use has been highlighted by the antics of certain F1 drivers, who if the laws were rigorously applied, to would not finish a race without an extended pit stop to explain exactly which accident they were avoiding to the stewards.
Other positives from not using the kerbs are your chassis will last much longer and you will not have to constantly replace your now mandatory disk protector every meeting.

Message Thread:

Spot on Itpro.  by 'raceinstructor'  << You are here!
This isn't new.  by 'DavyBoy'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 8:48)
not every circuit  by 'andrewf'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 9:46)
Re: not every circuit  by 'SimonS'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 21:46)
Re: not every circuit  by 'andrewf'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 9:12)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 22:27)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (22 Nov 2008 @ 23:06)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 0:08)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 0:16)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'raceinstructor'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 9:18)
Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:06)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:23)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 19:07)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 19:51)
Tripe  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:00)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:03)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:27)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 10:19)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 10:53)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:51)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:00)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'DavyBoy'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:18)
Re: Old timers have seen what HAPPENS if you....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:15)
So this is the rule that can't be relaxed!  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:38)
Re: So this is the rule that can't be relaxed!  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:04)
And......  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:13)
4 ie whole of the kart!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:13)
Ahhhh haaa!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:30)
I don't know if I agree or disagree with.......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:20)
Re: I don't know if I agree or disagree with......  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:34)
I'd have to hypothetically see the drivers  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:39)
Re: I'd have to hypothetically see the drivers  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:52)
Re: I'd have to hypothetically see the drivers  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 12:50)
You can't have a rule that covers all.......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:44)
Re: You can't have a rule that covers all.......  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:01)
Luckily every CoC in the Country is using........  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:39)
That's TRIPE Steve!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:08)
Re: That's TRIPE Steve!  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:25)
Historic, exactly!  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:43)
I knew you'd missed the point!  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:35)
Re: I knew you'd missed the point!  by 'itpro'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 16:42)
Not same size, but same shape!  by 'SteveC'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 10:57)
Wrong........... yet AGAIN, Steve!  by 'itpro'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:12)
Play on words Ian!  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:33)
I would be enforcing them as per MSA regs!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:40)
Re: seriously can't see what the fuss...  by 'SimonS'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 9:29)
When has the 'rule' ever been enforced  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 11:48)
Re: When has the 'rule' ever been enforced  by 'RobWallace'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 13:35)
Lucky it's only a disc protector.  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 13:46)
HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:02)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:32)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:02)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'DavyBoy'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:04)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:09)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'alanrr'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:07)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:20)
Tony hasn't CoC'd at Kim for over.....  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:46)
Re: Tony hasn't CoC'd at Kim for over.....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:45)
I don't need to re write it,........  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:17)
Re: HUNDREDS of time..... by GOOD cocs  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:01)
Your inconsistencies are STUNNING!  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:06)
You saying Tony Temple........  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)
ps As Junior British Team Manager Tony.....  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:42)
Re: ps As Junior British Team Manager Tony.....  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:52)
Rules with discretion are because no two.......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:23)
RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 17:58)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 18:25)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:13)
Of course 'Pierre' would get away with it!!  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 22:47)
Re: Of course 'Pierre' would get away with it!!  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 2:04)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:07)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 20:18)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'rotaxmxr'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 21:14)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (23 Nov 2008 @ 21:29)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'davidmc'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 9:36)
DavidMc  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:01)
Re: DavidMc  by 'davidmc'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)
Re: DavidMc  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:30)
Re: RotaxMxr  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 2:17)
itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 8:39)
Re: itpro  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:09)
Re: itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:39)
Re: itpro  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:57)
Re: itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:27)
Re: itpro  by 'Florent'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:51)
How unusual!  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:01)
Re: How unusual!  by 'Florent'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:13)
Re: How unusual!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:52)
You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:25)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 12:11)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:25)
Behave Ian, Florent is a great guy!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:52)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:15)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:23)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:28)
Re: You forgot Number 9 Florent!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)
cont..  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:34)
Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,......  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:50)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:19)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:25)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)
Re: Ian is actually neither laughable nor sad,....  by 'Florent'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 14:37)
English culture lessons for free!  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:16)
Re: Is.....  by 'Aztech'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 22:30)
It's exciting, it's waht it must have been like...  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 9:57)
Re: Thats quite funy Steve...  by 'Aztech'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 10:03)
I could do it in a Jonathan Woss accent, but......  by 'SteveC'   (26 Nov 2008 @ 10:47)
Re: itpro  by 'itpro'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 16:54)
Re: itpro  by 'NJB'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:26)
Re: lol  by 'MattBell'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 18:42)
Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'DanXP1'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 19:36)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'broke'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 19:57)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'MattBell'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:10)
Matt  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:21)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:41)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'DanXP1'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:55)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'MattBell'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 21:42)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'DanXP1'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 22:38)
Some answers to this.  by 'DavyBoy'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 9:20)
Re: Kerbing only ok cos drivers get a way with it  by 'adey8ball'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 9:59)
re the Clay chicane  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:32)
Matt  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:35)
Dan, Dave, RceInstr, etc..  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 10:46)
Re: itpro  by 'MattBell'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:01)
Re: Mat  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 11:13)
Matt + Re: Dan, Dave, RceInstr, etc..  by 'DanXP1'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 13:14)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Spot on Itpro."
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk