UK Karting - Notice Board (Combined Forum) : Re: this is the link I wanted post

Notice Board (Combined Forum)

Re: this is the link I wanted post
Posted by 'itpro' on 13 Nov 2008 @ 10:03

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

itproJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]

Be honest, Tmoon. Other with to me, with whom ELSE have you DISCUSSED GW? What other LITERATURE (NOT newspapers!) have you read on the subject? Where else are you searching for REVIEWED info.?

It's thus unfair to categories ALL 'GW Scientists' (who range from meteorologists, environmentalists, physicists, chemists, biologists, geologists, etc.) as being SO 'single minded'! They are NOT!

Even for me (and I am NOT a GW Scientists), this subject has been pretty damned wide ranging.

Remember, we ALL accept that NATURALLY (i.e, non-human-produced) 'Co2' ADDS to the 'problem' but there's not a lot we can DO about 'Volcanos'. If we COULD stop volcanic emmissions, then we could FORGET about 'human' input! If you can suggest a method................?

However, there IS something we can DO about O*U*R emmissions! There would be little point in me asking you to campaign against Volcanos but there IS a point to explaining WHY it may WELL be worthwhile doing something about our OWN emmissions!

Ian

Message Thread:

bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:47)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:53)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:27)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:11)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:32)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:51)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'davidmc' (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:24)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:50)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:23)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:55)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:07)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:48)

nucular testing by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:18)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)

Re: nucular testing by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:14)

Re: nucular testing by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:17)

Re: nucular testing by 'davidmc' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:06)

Re: nucular testing by 'RoadRat' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)

more evidence by 'singers' (08 Nov 2008 @ 11:54)

Re: more evidence by 'Tmoon' (08 Nov 2008 @ 15:30)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:38)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:50)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 13:22)

Re: nucular testing by 'RoadRat' (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)

Re: nucular testing by 'RoadRat' (11 Nov 2008 @ 15:16)

Hold the front page! by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:05)

Re: Hold the front page! by 'RoadRat' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:45)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:56)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:58)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:31)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 2:26)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:08)

By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!! by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:31)

Re: By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!! by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:35)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 13:40)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:23)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:27)

Re: nucular testing by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:35)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:57)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:02)

I think this has proved the point by 'Canceric' (08 Nov 2008 @ 22:07)

Re: I think this has proved the point by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)

Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic.. by 'Chad' (11 Nov 2008 @ 22:52)

Re: Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic.. by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:29)

Ian .go and buy a large mirror ... by 'Chad' (12 Nov 2008 @ 5:46)

alternative by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 9:56)

Tmoon by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:26)

Re: Tmoon by 'davidmc' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:41)

David by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:47)

Re: Itpro by 'RoadRat' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:00)

RoadRat by 'itpro' (14 Nov 2008 @ 9:57)

ITPRO by 'RoadRat' (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:17)

Re: ITPRO by 'itpro' (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:25)

Re: Ian .go and buy a large mirror ... by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:10)

Sticks and stones ... by 'Chad' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:16)

That DID make me laugh..... by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:30)

cent spill for shot by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:17)

concider this by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:08)

try this link by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)

Re: concider this by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)

Re: cent spill for shot by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:13)

spilling betta now by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:27)

Re: spilling betta now by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)

Re: spilling betta now by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:15)

this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:26)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:53)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' << You are here!

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (13 Nov 2008 @ 19:17)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (14 Nov 2008 @ 2:08)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links