UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




bias-proof future assessments!
Posted by 'singers' on 07 Nov 2008 @ 09:47


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
singers
Joined: April 2003
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
"The hockey stick debate is about two things. At a technical level it concerns a well-known study that characterized the state of the Earth's climate over the past thousand years and seemed to prove a recent and unprecedented global warming. I will explain how the study got the results it did, examine some key flaws in the methodology and explain why the conclusions are unsupported by the data. At the political level the emerging debate is about whether the enormous international trust that has been placed in the IPCC was betrayed. The hockey stick story reveals that the IPCC allowed a deeply flawed study to dominate the Third Assessment Report, which suggests the possibility of bias in the Report-writing process. In view of the massive global influence of IPCC Reports, there is an urgent need to bias-proof future assessments in order to put climate policy onto a new foundation that will better serve the public interest."


have you noticed that 50% of my links and posts go unanswered by itpro, coz he has no argument about it! he just brings up Philip Pullman every time.

told you before, running scared!

Message Thread:

bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'  << You are here!
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:53)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:27)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:11)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:32)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:51)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'davidmc'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:24)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:50)
Re: bias-proof future assessments!  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:23)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:55)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:07)
Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:48)
nucular testing  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:18)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)
Re: nucular testing  by 'singers'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:14)
Re: nucular testing  by 'Tmoon'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:17)
Re: nucular testing  by 'davidmc'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:06)
Re: nucular testing  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)
more evidence  by 'singers'   (08 Nov 2008 @ 11:54)
Re: more evidence  by 'Tmoon'   (08 Nov 2008 @ 15:30)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:38)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:50)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 13:22)
Re: nucular testing  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)
Re: nucular testing  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 15:16)
Hold the front page!  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:05)
Re: Hold the front page!  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:45)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:56)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:58)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:31)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 2:26)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:08)
By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!!  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:31)
Re: By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!!  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:35)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 13:40)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:23)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:27)
Re: nucular testing  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:35)
Re: nucular testing  by 'richpudd2003'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:57)
Re: nucular testing  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:02)
I think this has proved the point  by 'Canceric'   (08 Nov 2008 @ 22:07)
Re: I think this has proved the point  by 'itpro'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)
Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic..  by 'Chad'   (11 Nov 2008 @ 22:52)
Re: Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic..  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:29)
Ian .go and buy a large mirror ...  by 'Chad'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 5:46)
alternative  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 9:56)
Tmoon  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:26)
Re: Tmoon  by 'davidmc'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:41)
David  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:47)
Re: Itpro  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:00)
RoadRat  by 'itpro'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 9:57)
ITPRO  by 'RoadRat'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:17)
Re: ITPRO  by 'itpro'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:25)
Re: Ian .go and buy a large mirror ...  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:10)
Sticks and stones ...  by 'Chad'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:16)
That DID make me laugh.....  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:30)
cent spill for shot  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:17)
concider this  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:08)
try this link  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)
Re: concider this  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)
Re: cent spill for shot  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:13)
spilling betta now  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:27)
Re: spilling betta now  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)
Re: spilling betta now  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:15)
this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:26)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:53)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (13 Nov 2008 @ 10:03)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'Tmoon'   (13 Nov 2008 @ 19:17)
Re: this is the link I wanted post  by 'itpro'   (14 Nov 2008 @ 2:08)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: bias-proof future assessments!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk