UK Karting - Notice Board (Combined Forum) : Re: part 3

Notice Board (Combined Forum)

Re: part 3
Posted by 'itpro' on 06 Nov 2008 @ 17:57

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

itproJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]

Tmoon....... don't YOU start!

You, like Singers, are cofusing the STAGGERINGLY repetitive sun spot cycles (11 years) with OTHER potential changes in the sun's outputs!

The second point that Singers misuderstood is that the Sun gives off MORE heat and 'material' at times of LOTS of Sun Spots and less of BOTH when there are NO Sun Spots! We have just arrived at the REPEATED 11 year low in numbers of Sun Spots and have been heading that way for the last 5.5 years! That LOW level of Sun Spots has been coinciding with an INCREASE in Global Temps. I am STILL awaiting how Singers explains THAT 'conflict' of his ideas! If it WAS 'sun spots' we'd see Global Warming with an 11 year cycle........... and we DO NOT!!!!!!!!!

Secondly, as Sun Spots fluctuaute over an 11 year cycle, how does THAT explain the current round of GW started about 150 to 100 years ago, In that time, we would have had TEN peaks and troughs. So..... how does THAT 11 year cycle give rise to a 100-150 STEADY climb????

*********************

Not a soul on this PLANET (with any sense!) would doubt that SOME fluctuations in the Sun's output COULD cause Global Warming AND/OR Cooling. We would be STUPID so to do!

However, it CANNOT be the 'sun spot' cycle (as discssued above) as the 'timing is TOTALLY wrong. So....... just tell us WHAT it IS about the the Sun that HAS been increasing in its output over those 100-150years because NO ONE ELSE has been able to FIND it!

And we HAVE been LOOKING!!!!!!

Ian

Message Thread:

this will effect the climate! by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:44)

please just read this by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 15:35)

Re: please just read this by 'RoadRat' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:19)

Re: please just read this by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:41)

Re: this will effect the climate! by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 16:31)

Re: this will effect the climate! by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:19)

Re: this will effect the climate! by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:40)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'daveleeroth' (05 Nov 2008 @ 8:22)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 9:26)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'RobWallace' (05 Nov 2008 @ 18:48)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 19:27)

blah blah blah! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 12:44)

Re: blah blah blah! by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 12:57)

Re: blah blah blah! by 'carladingding' (05 Nov 2008 @ 13:44)

Re: blah blah blah! by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 14:05)

Reasons to be cheerful - part 1 by 'Tmoon' (05 Nov 2008 @ 15:38)

Re: Reasons to be cheerful - part 2 by 'Tmoon' (05 Nov 2008 @ 15:45)

acrimoneous......lol by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:18)

Anyone want a good laugh.....? by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:46)

Re: acrimoneous......lol by 'davidmc' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)

screw you and YOU! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:44)

Ah...nice to see you.... by 'vic' (05 Nov 2008 @ 21:59)

this is not cut and dried! how many times! by 'singers' (06 Nov 2008 @ 9:23)

Singers by 'itpro' (06 Nov 2008 @ 18:14)

Staggering!....Absolutely Staggering! by 'vic' (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:35)

acremoneous debate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:47)

Re: Reasons to be cheerful - part 2 by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:29)

hallelujah! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:25)

Re: hallelujah! by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)

part 3 by 'Tmoon' (06 Nov 2008 @ 11:44)

wow!! by 'Tmoon' (06 Nov 2008 @ 11:56)

without tring to bored you..... by 'Tmoon' (06 Nov 2008 @ 15:22)

off onto another tangent...... by 'richpudd2003' (06 Nov 2008 @ 16:23)

Re: part 3 by 'itpro' << You are here!

Don't you think? by 'Canceric' (06 Nov 2008 @ 22:10)

Re: Don't you think? by 'itpro' (06 Nov 2008 @ 23:52)

shame you're such a by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:36)

Re: shame you're such a by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:58)

I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:47)

Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:02)

Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:16)

Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:06)

Re: shame you're such a by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:13)

Re: shame you're such a by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:24)

that would be the Polar cusp then! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:58)

see the spirals at the South Pole by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:09)

Re: see the spirals at the South Pole by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)

Re: that would be the Polar cusp then! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)

wrong!! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:38)

Re: wrong!! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:35)

Re: wrong again!!! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:17)

Re: wrong again!!!....or.... by 'vic' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:26)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links