UK Karting - Notice Board (Combined Forum) : please just read this

Notice Board (Combined Forum)

please just read this
Posted by 'singers' on 04 Nov 2008 @ 15:35

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

singersJoined: April 2003
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

It is safe to assume that many people have started to become sceptical concerning the dynamics of so called "man made climate change". In recent years there have been seen to be many inconsistencies in the proposition that we have changed the Earth's climate with our pollution.

The World's Governments' solution to apply "green taxation" as a cure in the light of an unscientific philosophy of climate change is starting to fall apart, CO2 output has continued to rise and yet global temperatures have started to fall!

One thing that needs to be established, there is no doubt whatsoever there has been a climate change in the last 50-60 years. So just because you are a CO2Sceptic, that is not on the basis that you are in some sort of denial about this change. Global climate data clearly shows that there has been an increase in world temperatures in the past few decades.

If you look closely at the Global Temperatures graph below you will notice that Annual Average Temperatures peaked in 1998, and have been in general decline ever since. Unlike temperature figures, you will see that CO2 output is still increasing.

Now ask yourself a simple question. Is CO2 driving the world's temperature changes?

It would appear not!

Being a CO2 Sceptic does not mean that you are against being "green" or that you are ignorant about environmental issues such as recycling or objecting to the burning of fossil fuels that poison and contaminate the atmosphere in which we live and breathe. As far as we are concerned a CO2 Sceptic is someone who believes there is a more logical explanation to the increase in global temperatures that we have experienced in the last few decades.

The aims and objectives of this site are to draw attention to other possible explanations as to what has made our climate change and also to voice an educated opinion against the unscientific and unsubstantiated reasoning behind "green taxation" which is supposed to stop so called "Man Made Climate Change". A Green Tax on pollution is one thing but not in the name of reducing climate change. This site is for those of us who believe that man has no control over our climate, just the contamination of the food and air we breathe.

CO2 Sceptics will actively promote the proposition that there is no such thing as "Man Made Climate Change", until the World's Governments recognize that Climate Change and Man Made Pollution are two separate issues and not part of the same problem as currently promoted by "Climate Change Journalists" and Government funded scientists.

We are also in direct contact with several leading people who support this cause and they will drop in from time to time to answer some of your questions.

There is a "freedom of speech" policy concerning members who wish to put forward their "Man Made Climate Change" point of view in the forum part of this site. Those who wish to argue that we are wrong are welcome to do so and all contributors will be closely moderated to ensure civility and a mutually respectful attitude.

After all, we are all looking for the most suitable ways of preserving the planet for future generations of humanity and all plant and animal life.

We are all on the same side and differ only as regards means.

straw poll?

for or against?

Message Thread:

this will effect the climate! by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:44)

please just read this by 'singers' << You are here!

Re: please just read this by 'RoadRat' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:19)

Re: please just read this by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:41)

Re: this will effect the climate! by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 16:31)

Re: this will effect the climate! by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:19)

Re: this will effect the climate! by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:40)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'daveleeroth' (05 Nov 2008 @ 8:22)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 9:26)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'RobWallace' (05 Nov 2008 @ 18:48)

Re: this will effect the climate! addendum by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 19:27)

blah blah blah! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 12:44)

Re: blah blah blah! by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 12:57)

Re: blah blah blah! by 'carladingding' (05 Nov 2008 @ 13:44)

Re: blah blah blah! by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 14:05)

Reasons to be cheerful - part 1 by 'Tmoon' (05 Nov 2008 @ 15:38)

Re: Reasons to be cheerful - part 2 by 'Tmoon' (05 Nov 2008 @ 15:45)

acrimoneous......lol by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:18)

Anyone want a good laugh.....? by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:46)

Re: acrimoneous......lol by 'davidmc' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)

screw you and YOU! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:44)

Ah...nice to see you.... by 'vic' (05 Nov 2008 @ 21:59)

this is not cut and dried! how many times! by 'singers' (06 Nov 2008 @ 9:23)

Singers by 'itpro' (06 Nov 2008 @ 18:14)

Staggering!....Absolutely Staggering! by 'vic' (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:35)

acremoneous debate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 20:47)

Re: Reasons to be cheerful - part 2 by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:29)

hallelujah! by 'singers' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:25)

Re: hallelujah! by 'itpro' (05 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)

part 3 by 'Tmoon' (06 Nov 2008 @ 11:44)

wow!! by 'Tmoon' (06 Nov 2008 @ 11:56)

without tring to bored you..... by 'Tmoon' (06 Nov 2008 @ 15:22)

off onto another tangent...... by 'richpudd2003' (06 Nov 2008 @ 16:23)

Re: part 3 by 'itpro' (06 Nov 2008 @ 17:57)

Don't you think? by 'Canceric' (06 Nov 2008 @ 22:10)

Re: Don't you think? by 'itpro' (06 Nov 2008 @ 23:52)

shame you're such a by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:36)

Re: shame you're such a by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:58)

I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:47)

Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:02)

Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:16)

Re: I was refering to the maunder minimum by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:06)

Re: shame you're such a by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:13)

Re: shame you're such a by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:24)

that would be the Polar cusp then! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:58)

see the spirals at the South Pole by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:09)

Re: see the spirals at the South Pole by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)

Re: that would be the Polar cusp then! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)

wrong!! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 14:38)

Re: wrong!! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:35)

Re: wrong again!!! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:17)

Re: wrong again!!!....or.... by 'vic' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:26)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links