UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




same OLD same OLD
Posted by 'singers' on 31 Oct 2008 @ 22:16


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
singers
Joined: April 2003
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
sounds like you're running scared!

again you're accusing me, therefore accusing peer reviewed scientists of being imbeciles!

“Even Doubling Or Tripling The Amount Of CO2' Will Have 'Little Impact' On Temperatures,” says Dr. Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ. Duffy has published 218 journal, peer-reviewed papers and conference papers including 10 patents and 62 technical reports.

and Stephen Wilde, a fellow of the Royal Meteorogical Society: Stephen Wilde has been a Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society since 1968. The first two article's from Mr Wilde were received with a great deal of interest throughout the Co2 Sceptic community.

http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1041

you are BLINDLY purporting that my theories are dreamt up by me but you fail to even comprehend the science behind the information.

a true scientist would investigate.

people make their own minds up, you have obviously made yours and the more you keep trying to discredit me all the time the more I am going to keep making your blood boil!! ha ha!

Message Thread:

dark matter  by 'singers'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 16:14)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:17)
Re: dark matter  by 'kudos'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 1:21)
Re: dark matter  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 9:05)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)
Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 14:50)
Dark Matter  by 'Gillard77'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 15:03)
Re: Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 16:58)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:28)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:49)
Alf Garnett, lol  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:14)
Singers  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:36)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 18:14)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 19:03)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:12)
.... continued  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:20)
Re: .... continued  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:55)
Road Rat  by 'itpro'   (29 Oct 2008 @ 0:14)
why bother! falls on deaf ears!  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 16:28)
As you'd expect form Singers.....  by 'itpro'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 18:13)
same OLD same OLD  by 'singers'  << You are here!
Re: same OLD same OLD  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)
you don't half took rot  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:35)
Re: you don't half took rot  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)
SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 9:04)
Re: SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:22)
you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:47)
Re: you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:37)
Ha ha ha! Thats a good'un!  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 8:57)
Oh.... Vic, you ain't seen the NEXT one!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 10:39)
you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:03)
Re: you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:48)
Singers.......  by 'vic'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:57)
Re: Singers.......  by 'brinjono'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:02)
nope!  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)
Re: nope!  by 'vic'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 13:22)
Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:51)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:53)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)
Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 1:30)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 15:25)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:57)
canceric  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:55)
Re: canceric  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:47)
Re: canceric  by 'mobilechicane'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 6:55)
mobilechicane  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)
Re: mobilechicane  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)
singers....  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 20:40)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: same OLD same OLD"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk