UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Singers
Posted by 'itpro' on 27 Oct 2008 @ 10:36


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
Again, you do it: in that ONE statement show how LITTLE you comprehend of the SCALE of the things you suggest!

You have made the PATHETIC assumption that because a Galaxy is LARGER then the Moon, it might have a greater effect or even a MEASURABLE effect on Earth than does the rather small Moon.

Well, let's use THAT one as a way of showing your TOTAL lack of apprciation of the SCALE of these things!

Let's also make it EASY for you; let's not choose a whole GALAXY, let's choose something that you MIGHT be able to consider, the MONSTROUS mass of Jupiter!

Let's compare the EFFECTS of the Moon and, the somewhat LARGER mass of JUPITER! Just to help you, the mass (and thus gravitational 'pull') of Jupiter is 2641 times GREATER than the Moon's.

So...... which one (Moon or Jupiter) has more EFFECT on the Earth and HOW much 'more or less' does it do so?????

Just to help your tiny mind here, let me explain: I am using Jupiter becasue the TOTAL gravitational effects of Jupiter on the Earth are well known, as are the effects of the Moon. I won't explain QUITE yet why so LITTLE work has been done on the effects of other galaxies on the Earth but, if you have ANY sort of brain, you might JUST be able to see WHY!

So..... give it your best shot!

***********

Do you know which is the only OTHER group of MORONS who think that the planets and stars have any significant EFFECT on human life?????

Astrologers...... and I just supect that you probably DO believe in astrology, don't you!

Ian

Message Thread:

dark matter  by 'singers'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 16:14)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:17)
Re: dark matter  by 'kudos'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 1:21)
Re: dark matter  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 9:05)
Re: dark matter  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)
Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 14:50)
Dark Matter  by 'Gillard77'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 15:03)
Re: Victor Bouqet! ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 16:58)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'singers'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:28)
Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:49)
Alf Garnett, lol  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:14)
Singers  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 18:14)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 19:03)
Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:12)
.... continued  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:20)
Re: .... continued  by 'RoadRat'   (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:55)
Road Rat  by 'itpro'   (29 Oct 2008 @ 0:14)
why bother! falls on deaf ears!  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 16:28)
As you'd expect form Singers.....  by 'itpro'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 18:13)
same OLD same OLD  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:16)
Re: same OLD same OLD  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)
you don't half took rot  by 'singers'   (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:35)
Re: you don't half took rot  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)
SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 9:04)
Re: SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:22)
you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:47)
Re: you know I'm right, here's your proof  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:37)
Ha ha ha! Thats a good'un!  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 8:57)
Oh.... Vic, you ain't seen the NEXT one!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 10:39)
you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:03)
Re: you're BOTH wrong again!  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:48)
Singers.......  by 'vic'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:57)
Re: Singers.......  by 'brinjono'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:02)
nope!  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)
Re: nope!  by 'vic'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 13:22)
Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:51)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'singers'   (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:53)
Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)
Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 1:30)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'Canceric'   (02 Nov 2008 @ 15:25)
Re: Itpro & Singers  by 'itpro'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:57)
canceric  by 'singers'   (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:55)
Re: canceric  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:47)
Re: canceric  by 'mobilechicane'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 6:55)
mobilechicane  by 'singers'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)
Re: mobilechicane  by 'itpro'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)
singers....  by 'vic'   (04 Nov 2008 @ 20:40)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Singers"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk