UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Dear Foggy
Posted by 'itpro' on 21 Oct 2008 @ 01:50


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
I am glad YOU are not my solicitor! But, perhaps you ARE one and that explains why you don't bother to READ before you answer!

Note what Hulacki said in his FIRST comment:-

"....am not just going to come on here a blame others.
for starters i am not going to point any fingers and blame anyone (yet). therefore im not going to say which engine it is until we have proved it wasn’t us that have touched the engine by showing that none of our seals have been tampered with."

The implication is PLAIN: he feels that he BOUGHT the motor AFTER it was 'tampered with'. Thus he, VERY wisely, is NOT going to name names until he feels SAFE doing so (if ever). He clearly wants us to feel that naming names BEFORE he can 'prove' the matter WOULD put him at further risk. Not only that but any sane person would notice that OTHER readers have assumed that implication WITHOUT it being NAMED!

The 'accused' person would be EXPECTED to suffer a reduction in their credibility as a vendor (which is EXACTLY what the likes of Graham and others have implied), and, if they could show that the named person had LOST sales, unfairly, then the named person have GOOD grounds to pursue a case for damages!

However, you clearly feel that you DO know what you are talking about. So..... if you feel SO sure that it is 'safe' to publish the name, then ASK Hulacki, in private, giving him WRITTEN ASSURANCES that YOU will underwrite any damages caused by publication and THEN PUBLISH it!

Let's see how brave YOU are when it's YOUR money and not some else's!

What am I offered as a bet that you WON'T put your MONEY where YOUR mouth is?


Ian

Message Thread:

well done paul classon  by 'rhysj'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 20:09)
Re: well done paul classon  by 'TTracer5'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 20:21)
well done paul classon and well done the cheats  by 'rotaxdave'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 20:48)
Re: well done paul classon and well done the cheat  by 'rhysj'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 20:52)
Re: well done paul classon  by 'Foggy996'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 20:51)
Re: Apparently..  by 'carladingding'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 21:27)
Re: Apparently..  by 'hulacki19'   (15 Oct 2008 @ 22:16)
Re: Apparently your good  by 'rotaxdave'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 9:12)
Re: Apparently your good  by 'carladingding'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 10:49)
Where did you get the engine from Will  by 'grahamrich1'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 11:06)
Re: Apparently..  by 'BigCol'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 11:30)
Re: Apparently..  by 'Foggy996'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 11:54)
Re: Apparently..  by 'grahamrich1'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 12:04)
Re: Apparently..  by 'TTracer5'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 12:58)
Re: Apparently..  by 'Brian'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 13:25)
Re: Apparently..  by 'hulacki19'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 17:41)
So your defence is you didn't know.  by 'grahamrich1'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 17:47)
Re: So your defence is you didn't know.  by 'rotaxdave'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 18:50)
Re: So your defence is you didn't know.  by 'rhysj'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 19:43)
Re: So your defence is you didn't know.  by 'pccsystems'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 20:02)
Re: The reason for the seal  by 'pccsystems'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 20:13)
So still not answers...  by 'grahamrich1'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 20:57)
Re: Blame.....  by 'TTracer5'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 21:11)
Guys......  by 'itpro'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 2:06)
Re: Guys......  by 'michaelg36'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 2:51)
Re: Guys......  by 'Foggy996'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 8:14)
Re: Guys......  by 'grahamrich1'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 8:36)
Re: Is yours legal  by 'pccsystems'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 10:24)
Re: Is yours legal (cont)  by 'grahamrich1'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 13:56)
Re: Is yours legal (cont)  by 'pccsystems'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 17:28)
I agree  by 'grahamrich1'   (17 Oct 2008 @ 17:36)
Foggy.... smell the COFFEE here!  by 'itpro'   (20 Oct 2008 @ 19:21)
Re: Foggy.... smell the COFFEE here!  by 'Foggy996'   (20 Oct 2008 @ 20:15)
Dear Foggy  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: Dear Foggy  by 'Foggy996'   (22 Oct 2008 @ 15:16)
Re: Dear Foggy  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 1:21)
Re: Dear Foggy  by 'Foggy996'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 10:01)
Inconsistent again, Foggy! You DID reply!  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 10:14)
Going slightly off the point here  by 'grahamrich1'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 17:37)
Re: Going slightly off the point here  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:30)
Re: Guys......  by 'BigJohn'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 17:04)
Re: Guys......  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:37)
Re: Guys......  by 'BigJohn'   (23 Oct 2008 @ 20:21)
Re: Guys......  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 11:14)
Re: Guys......  by 'grahamrich1'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 11:58)
Re: Guys......  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 12:12)
Re: Guys......  by 'grahamrich1'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 12:29)
Re: Guys......  by 'itpro'   (24 Oct 2008 @ 13:47)
Re: Apparently..  by 'SteveGraves'   (16 Oct 2008 @ 23:32)
Re: I Think everyone  by 'TKM4sDad'   (18 Oct 2008 @ 13:08)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Dear Foggy"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk