UK Karting - Notice Board (Combined Forum) : Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.

Notice Board (Combined Forum)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.
Posted by 'itpro' on 06 Oct 2008 @ 15:22

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

itproJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]

No Devon, that fraction you mention would produce/require VAST amounts of "sloshing" of the oceans! Just THINK how 'heavy' the Earth IS and how much force would be needed to MOVE it! Go and spin a car's wheel then then try to change the angle of its axis! The forces required are WAY beyond VAST!

Of course the core is molten (well....... the very 'core' may NOT be but that IS under discussion but the REST is!). I am discussing the SURFACE. Forget the seas. They would have evaporated in MOMENTS after THAT amount of 'force' was applied. It's the NUMBERS that you have 'wrong'! Look up that page that I have chosen, almost at random, about the earth's axis. You'll SEE the REAL figures: it is NOT 6 years to move 3 degrees, it's FORTY TWO THOUSAND YEARS!

next:----

Absolutely NO (zero, nil, nada!) energy is being used to TILT the Earth's axis! It is at the angle it is BECAUSE the forces being applied to it are MINUSCULE! In truth, those forces DO exist but they are SO small (when compared to our mass) that they will take 40,000 YEARS to move us by 3 degrees! And even then, that's an 'oscilation'; we WILL swing BACK again. We won't REMAIN tilted by a further 3 degrees as. over the following 40,000 we will swing back even MORE 'upright' than we are now!

next:---- "the earths poles are not exactly opposed".... err...... WHAT?

Are you trying to suggest that the Earth is rotating EXcentrically???? No, Devon. The Poles are EXACTLY where the NEED to be to make the earth rotate around its centre of MASS. The Earth does NOT have an 'axle' and thus there is NO other choice but for the Earth to rotate EXACTLY around it's two 'poles'. Yes, the Earth is NOT a perfect sphere but the LARGEST amount of 'error' is that the earth is 'fatter' around it's equator by about 26 miles than it should be to make a PERFECT sphere!

Think it through, the single highest MOUNTAIN is only 5 miles high! How could there be any MORE of a 'bulge' ANYWHERE than 5 miles WITHOUT THAT becoming the highest mountain!

In truth, in case this is not clear, the poles are DEFINED as being a line PERFECTLY joining (and extending beyond) the two places where the centres of the earth's rotation meet the surfaces. It's THAT way round; it's NOT that the Earth rotates ON it's poles! Please do NOT confuse magnetic north/south with the REAL 'poles'.

Ian

Message Thread:

Itpro Hornets Nest by 'RoadRat' (04 Oct 2008 @ 21:07)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'Booney' (04 Oct 2008 @ 21:57)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'RoadRat' (04 Oct 2008 @ 22:58)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'DevonHawker' (05 Oct 2008 @ 12:14)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:34)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'DevonHawker' (06 Oct 2008 @ 9:27)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:33)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'DevonHawker' (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:02)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:48)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'DevonHawker' (06 Oct 2008 @ 14:22)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'itpro' << You are here!

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'DevonHawker' (06 Oct 2008 @ 15:52)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 16:22)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. Booney by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:30)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'itpro' (05 Oct 2008 @ 0:38)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'NikG' (05 Oct 2008 @ 7:59)

Nik by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:04)

Re: Nik by 'NikG' (06 Oct 2008 @ 8:29)

Re: Nik by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:36)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'cobb22' (05 Oct 2008 @ 8:11)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'Hootsman' (05 Oct 2008 @ 10:24)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest: Cobb! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:08)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest: Cobb! by 'cobb22' (06 Oct 2008 @ 21:29)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'rmax' (05 Oct 2008 @ 10:34)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'DavyBoy' (05 Oct 2008 @ 12:11)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest by 'DevonHawker' (05 Oct 2008 @ 12:20)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:19)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'RoadRat' (06 Oct 2008 @ 7:46)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:41)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'DavyBoy' (06 Oct 2008 @ 8:02)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:50)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'blobslosak' (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:22)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:54)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'DavyBoy' (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:51)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 12:02)

No wonder were all confused........ by 'RoadRat' (06 Oct 2008 @ 12:44)

Re: No wonder were all confused........ by 'blobslosak' (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:10)

Blob... by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:25)

Re: Blob... by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:31)

Now we are getting somewhere! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:20)

Re: Now we are getting somewhere! by 'davidmc' (06 Oct 2008 @ 18:02)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'DavyBoy' (06 Oct 2008 @ 14:15)

Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy! by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 15:40)

Let's move off this. by 'DavyBoy' (06 Oct 2008 @ 17:00)

Re: Let's move off this. by 'itpro' (06 Oct 2008 @ 19:43)

Re: Let's move off this. by 'blobslosak' (06 Oct 2008 @ 19:59)

A thousand to 1 or better? by 'RoadRat' (06 Oct 2008 @ 20:00)

I'll take that bet! by 'TanglerTKM' (06 Oct 2008 @ 21:55)

Re: A thousand to 1 or better? by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 0:51)

Monty Python............................... by 'RoadRat' (07 Oct 2008 @ 8:35)

Re.Rat...... by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 9:29)

Is Vic there ? by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)

No one expects the Climate Change Inquisition by 'RoadRat' (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:52)

Re: No one expects the Climate Change Inquisition by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:12)

Re: Monty Python............................... by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:22)

Re: Monty Python............................... by 'RoadRat' (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:45)

Oh dear....One phrase says it all....... by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:12)

Vic..... another classic by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 14:05)

Ian.....It was Eritosthanes (sp!).... by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 14:30)

Re: Ian.....It was Eritosthanes (sp!).... by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 15:14)

aCLASSIC, And my last word to you! by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:38)

Re: Let's move off this. by 'DavyBoy' (06 Oct 2008 @ 20:49)

Re: Let's move off this. by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 1:07)

Prevarication by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 9:14)

Re: Prevarication........you said it! by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 9:39)

Sadly, Vic....... they will do EXACTLY that! by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)

Re: Sadly, Vic....... they will do EXACTLY that! by 'davidmc' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:58)

Please..... by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 21:09)

Re: Please..... by 'davidmc' (07 Oct 2008 @ 21:53)

Time's running out!... by 'vic' (08 Oct 2008 @ 6:20)

Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'vic' (08 Oct 2008 @ 8:39)

What's that got to do with it ? by 'DavyBoy' (08 Oct 2008 @ 9:10)

Well, you brought it up........ by 'vic' (08 Oct 2008 @ 10:15)

I don't believe I did ! by 'DavyBoy' (08 Oct 2008 @ 11:53)

OK... by 'vic' (08 Oct 2008 @ 12:51)

Not OK... I'm DavyBoy... not davidmc ! by 'DavyBoy' (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:12)

Davy...... by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:27)

Yup..sorry.... by 'vic' (08 Oct 2008 @ 14:11)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'davidmc' (08 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:46)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'davidmc' (08 Oct 2008 @ 17:05)

The undeniable proof of Global Warming! by 'TanglerTKM' (08 Oct 2008 @ 19:30)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 19:45)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'davidmc' (08 Oct 2008 @ 20:48)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'itpro' (09 Oct 2008 @ 1:00)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'davidmc' (09 Oct 2008 @ 9:00)

As an engineer myself... by 'vic' (09 Oct 2008 @ 12:55)

David by 'itpro' (09 Oct 2008 @ 13:05)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'QuickOldTimer' (09 Oct 2008 @ 13:14)

Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof.... by 'itpro' (09 Oct 2008 @ 13:21)

Re: Prevarication, tripe! by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:16)

Re: Prevarication, tripe... exactly ! by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:46)

Nice try..... but a failure! by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:37)

Re: Yes... but a failure of what ? by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:02)

Re: Yes... but a failure of what ? by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:24)

I haven't changed my position Ian. by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 14:31)

Re: I haven't changed my position Ian. by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 15:09)

Re: I haven't changed my position Ian. by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:08)

Arghhhhhhhh....... by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:27)

Where's the proof. by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 18:14)

Re: Where's the proof. by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:01)

Re: Arghhhhhhhh....... by 'davidmc' (07 Oct 2008 @ 22:04)

Re: Arghhhhhhhh....... by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:17)

Its not about 'belief'.. by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 15:54)

Vic by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:16)

What vanity by 'RoadRat' (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:39)

Re: What vanity by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:04)

It's all about belief and incidentally proof...... by 'RoadRat' (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:32)

Re: It's all about belief and incidentally proof.. by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:56)

Re: It's all about belief and incidentally proof.. by 'RoadRat' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:09)

Re: It's all about belief and incidentally proof.. by 'itpro' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:18)

Well..... by 'vic' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:12)

Re: Its EXACTLY about 'belief'.... by 'DavyBoy' (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:00)

Re: Its not about 'belief'.. by 'davidmc' (07 Oct 2008 @ 22:25)

Re: Its not about 'belief'.. by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:38)

Arrogance of your arguments by 'RoadRat' (08 Oct 2008 @ 14:11)

Re: Arrogance of YOUR arguments by 'itpro' (08 Oct 2008 @ 19:31)

Ah...something I can agree with by 'vic' (08 Oct 2008 @ 20:35)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links