UK Karting

Notice Board (Combined Forum)




Re: Itpro Hornets Nest
Posted by 'itpro' on 05 Oct 2008 @ 00:38


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
I don't want to be TOO rude but the reason you THINK there is some form of DEBATE occuring about it in the science community is becasue you are NOT reading the stuff published BY the 'scientific' community!

YES, the publications WILL include that one 'result' which says "it's ISN'T happening' but they'll also report MANY (but not ALL) of the articles which say 'it IS happening'!

The imbeciles who WRITE the stuff for newspapers and TV (plus the imbeciles who BELIEVE the newspapers/TV on the subject) cannot get their microscopic brains around the concept that 'science' will ALWAYS produce SOME contradicting results and they assume that becasue ONE result in 100 says 'no, it's NOT happening' that those results carry EQUAL weight to the 100 that yes 'YES IT IS HAPPENING'!

'Science' does NOT work like that! The results published by the majority W*I*N! It's THAT simple!

It would take too long to explain about HOW articles get selected for publishing but the REASON for this apparent bias towarsd the 'it's not happening' is BECAUSE of that 'publishing' selection. Think of it as being an example of giving EVERY view an airing..... who'd want to read 100 articles ALL saying 'yes it is happeing' people get BORED after the 10 arcticle on one subject and only report the ONE result which is contradictory! It's the 'Dog bites Man' versus 'Man bites DOG' concept

Obviously, you won''t want to read the REAL papers on the subjects but there is a BRILLIANT 'digest' which is REALLY easy to read, every week. It's called 'New Scientist'.

My 'real scientist' friends LAUGH at me for reading it and they describe it as 'The Sunday Mirror of the science world' but that is what I need...... and I suspect you do TOO!

READ the thing (it really IS written 'down' to our level and you will not find MUCH that's beyond you (except, perhaps, for some of the work on maths theory..... which is WAY beyond me!)) the rest is written so that the merely INTELLIGENT man can comprehend almost EVERY subject.

You won't have a SINGLE doubt left! Remember, I started by AGREEING with you on this subject! It looked wrong to ME, TOO! However, a few weeks reading will leave you CONVINCED! It is simply NOT open to debate anymore: we ARE in the SH***!

Ian

Message Thread:

Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'RoadRat'   (04 Oct 2008 @ 21:07)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'Booney'   (04 Oct 2008 @ 21:57)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'RoadRat'   (04 Oct 2008 @ 22:58)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'DevonHawker'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 12:14)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:34)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'DevonHawker'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 9:27)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:33)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'DevonHawker'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:02)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:48)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'DevonHawker'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 14:22)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 15:22)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'DevonHawker'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 15:52)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest.  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 16:22)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest. Booney  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:30)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'NikG'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 7:59)
Nik  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:04)
Re: Nik  by 'NikG'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 8:29)
Re: Nik  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:36)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'cobb22'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 8:11)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'Hootsman'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 10:24)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest: Cobb!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:08)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest: Cobb!  by 'cobb22'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 21:29)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'rmax'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 10:34)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'DavyBoy'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 12:11)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest  by 'DevonHawker'   (05 Oct 2008 @ 12:20)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 2:19)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'RoadRat'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 7:46)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:41)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'DavyBoy'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 8:02)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 10:50)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'blobslosak'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:22)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:54)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'DavyBoy'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 11:51)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 12:02)
No wonder were all confused........  by 'RoadRat'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 12:44)
Re: No wonder were all confused........  by 'blobslosak'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:10)
Blob...  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:25)
Re: Blob...  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:31)
Now we are getting somewhere!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 13:20)
Re: Now we are getting somewhere!  by 'davidmc'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 18:02)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'DavyBoy'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 14:15)
Re: Itpro Hornets Nest, Oh GOD, Davy!  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 15:40)
Let's move off this.  by 'DavyBoy'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 17:00)
Re: Let's move off this.  by 'itpro'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 19:43)
Re: Let's move off this.  by 'blobslosak'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 19:59)
A thousand to 1 or better?  by 'RoadRat'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 20:00)
I'll take that bet!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 21:55)
Re: A thousand to 1 or better?  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 0:51)
Monty Python...............................  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 8:35)
Re.Rat......  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 9:29)
Is Vic there ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)
No one expects the Climate Change Inquisition  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:52)
Re: No one expects the Climate Change Inquisition  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:12)
Re: Monty Python...............................  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:22)
Re: Monty Python...............................  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:45)
Oh dear....One phrase says it all.......  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:12)
Vic..... another classic  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 14:05)
Ian.....It was Eritosthanes (sp!)....  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 14:30)
Re: Ian.....It was Eritosthanes (sp!)....  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 15:14)
aCLASSIC, And my last word to you!  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:38)
Re: Let's move off this.  by 'DavyBoy'   (06 Oct 2008 @ 20:49)
Re: Let's move off this.  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 1:07)
Prevarication  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 9:14)
Re: Prevarication........you said it!  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 9:39)
Sadly, Vic....... they will do EXACTLY that!  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)
Re: Sadly, Vic....... they will do EXACTLY that!  by 'davidmc'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:58)
Please.....  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 21:09)
Re: Please.....  by 'davidmc'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 21:53)
Time's running out!...  by 'vic'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 6:20)
Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'vic'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 8:39)
What's that got to do with it ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 9:10)
Well, you brought it up........  by 'vic'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 10:15)
I don't believe I did !  by 'DavyBoy'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 11:53)
OK...  by 'vic'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 12:51)
Not OK... I'm DavyBoy... not davidmc !  by 'DavyBoy'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:12)
Davy......  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:27)
Yup..sorry....  by 'vic'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 14:11)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'davidmc'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:46)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'davidmc'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 17:05)
The undeniable proof of Global Warming!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 19:30)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 19:45)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'davidmc'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 20:48)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'itpro'   (09 Oct 2008 @ 1:00)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'davidmc'   (09 Oct 2008 @ 9:00)
As an engineer myself...  by 'vic'   (09 Oct 2008 @ 12:55)
David  by 'itpro'   (09 Oct 2008 @ 13:05)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (09 Oct 2008 @ 13:14)
Re: Well, the suns up.....and still no proof....  by 'itpro'   (09 Oct 2008 @ 13:21)
Re: Prevarication, tripe!  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:16)
Re: Prevarication, tripe... exactly !  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 10:46)
Nice try..... but a failure!  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 11:37)
Re: Yes... but a failure of what ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:02)
Re: Yes... but a failure of what ?  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 13:24)
I haven't changed my position Ian.  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 14:31)
Re: I haven't changed my position Ian.  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 15:09)
Re: I haven't changed my position Ian.  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:08)
Arghhhhhhhh.......  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:27)
Where's the proof.  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 18:14)
Re: Where's the proof.  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:01)
Re: Arghhhhhhhh.......  by 'davidmc'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 22:04)
Re: Arghhhhhhhh.......  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:17)
Its not about 'belief'..  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 15:54)
Vic  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:16)
What vanity  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:39)
Re: What vanity  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:04)
It's all about belief and incidentally proof......  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:32)
Re: It's all about belief and incidentally proof..  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 16:56)
Re: It's all about belief and incidentally proof..  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:09)
Re: It's all about belief and incidentally proof..  by 'itpro'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:18)
Well.....  by 'vic'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:12)
Re: Its EXACTLY about 'belief'....  by 'DavyBoy'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 17:00)
Re: Its not about 'belief'..  by 'davidmc'   (07 Oct 2008 @ 22:25)
Re: Its not about 'belief'..  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 13:38)
Arrogance of your arguments  by 'RoadRat'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 14:11)
Re: Arrogance of YOUR arguments  by 'itpro'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 19:31)
Ah...something I can agree with  by 'vic'   (08 Oct 2008 @ 20:35)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Itpro Hornets Nest"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk