UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,
Posted by 'PaulMRotax' on 05 May 2011 @ 08:54


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
PaulMRotax
Joined: May 2004
Total Posts: 22
[ View User Profile ]
"How do you know?"

errr, look at the number of tickets given and then the number that were given just prior to an accident of any sort.


"I haven't you said you are. You have yet to provide one reason not to have speed limits"

yes i have


" nor a reason why excess speed should not be discouraged,"

why would i?

" nor why it cannot be the sole determining factor in an accident."

well you need some vehicles for a start, then a road......

"In fact, nobody here has said people die soley through speed."

i think you will find there has.


" People die in road accidents for all sorts of reasons. We have however said that speed:

a) Increases the consequences of an accident"

possibly

"b) Increases the chances of an accident occuring"

possibly but reducing speed can do the same


"c) Can be the sole determining factor in an accident (i.e. the only thing someone could have done differently is to have reduced their speed)"

nope. manufacturers could save a lot of money if that were true.


"And how would that prevent accidents? As you yourself have stated, it would only be used after an accident. A little bit late then don't you think? Granted, it would have some benefits in improving vehicle safety and potentially, over a long period of time, driver training (but only by showing the types of accidents that occur and how they could be avoided)."

hum, dont you think it would be like having your driving examiner next to you all the time?


"Your argument basically boils down to, "I'd prefer not to have speed limits but accept they currently need to exist, Ian (and others) shouldn't say excess speed kills or try to discourage excess speeding, we should have better drivers and we should only concentrate on dangerous driving."

pretty much



"Remember, excess speed is one factor of dangerous driving that has been singled out because:

a) It is easy to police"

nope. the speed used is not a reflection of what is safe for the vehicle/road condition

"b) It plays a large part in reducing the chances of an accident"

or cause them in some instances

"c) It plays a large part in reducing the consequences of an accident."

usually

"Why is this a bad thing? "

look back through my posts

it catches the 'innocent'

it gives people a false sense of security

it stiffles better road safety


Message Thread:

speed kills ..... but how  by 'kudos'   (28 Apr 2011 @ 23:42)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Booney'   (28 Apr 2011 @ 23:57)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Newshound'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 0:01)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Booney'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 0:17)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'itpro'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 0:50)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'PaulMRotax'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 6:14)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Focused'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 7:38)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Attack2001'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 10:26)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Newshound'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 10:32)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Shanny'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 10:54)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'HC64'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:19)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Newshound'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:30)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'PaulMRotax'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 19:14)
Wait for it...  by 'Booney'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:35)
Re: Wait for it...  by 'Aquila'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:54)
Re: Wait for it...  by 'MattCortes'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 14:03)
Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 15:59)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 16:20)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Aquila'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 16:50)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 17:32)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Shanny'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 17:15)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Aquila'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 17:33)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'kudos'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 22:27)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Trev'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 0:12)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 9:02)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 15:35)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 20:02)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 14:42)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (01 May 2011 @ 17:20)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 19:58)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 20:32)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 21:01)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:02)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:46)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (03 May 2011 @ 1:25)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 May 2011 @ 1:50)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:36)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:42)
Re: Paul  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:17)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:39)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:16)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'kudos'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:59)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (01 May 2011 @ 15:29)
Shanny  by 'itpro'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 16:27)
Re: Shanny  by 'Newshound'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 17:35)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 20:20)
Re: Shanny  by 'Booney'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:08)
Re: Shanny  by 'itpro'   (01 May 2011 @ 1:00)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 7:05)
Re: Shanny  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (01 May 2011 @ 8:48)
Re: Shanny  by 'davidmc'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:34)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:53)
Re: Shanny  by 'davidmc'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:57)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:20)
David?  by 'Booney'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:15)
Re: David?  by 'MattCortes'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:22)
Re: David?  by 'davidmc'   (02 May 2011 @ 9:21)
Re: David?  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 May 2011 @ 11:30)
Re: David?  by 'davidmc'   (02 May 2011 @ 12:12)
Re: David?  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 May 2011 @ 12:44)
Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'itpro'   (02 May 2011 @ 23:18)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (02 May 2011 @ 23:36)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'itpro'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:56)
Volunteer required.  by 'alanrr'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:10)
Re: Volunteer required.  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:44)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:48)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:40)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 11:01)
Re: Shanny  by 'Booney'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:08)
Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'itpro'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:31)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 15:20)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 17:01)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 17:25)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 17:55)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 19:24)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:30)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:51)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:52)
Ian, answer the question  by 'Booney'   (03 May 2011 @ 19:56)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:06)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:39)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 23:03)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 8:35)
Re: errrrrr, you ARE joking, aren't you  by 'itpro'   (04 May 2011 @ 0:50)
Re: errrrrr, you ARE joking, aren't you  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 10:29)
Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (04 May 2011 @ 13:29)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 15:03)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'davidmc'   (04 May 2011 @ 16:00)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 18:56)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'davidmc'   (04 May 2011 @ 19:34)
Booooooneyyyyyy..... where ARE you.....?  by 'itpro'   (05 May 2011 @ 1:31)
Re: Booooooneyyyyyy..... where ARE you.....?  by 'PaulMRotax'   (05 May 2011 @ 8:57)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'PaulMRotax'  << You are here!
Attack  by 'itpro'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 16:22)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'jtthedevil'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 15:42)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'kudos'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:56)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'itpro'   (01 May 2011 @ 1:05)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 14:32)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk