"I was pointing out that the suggestion that the ENERGY involved in Nuclear explosions will have made a differnce is plain WRONG as the energy in a HYDROGEN bomb is PATHETIC compared to something we see every SECOND of the day on this planet!"
Using that logic, the human contribution to greenhouse gases is PATHETIC compared to the natural contributors, something like 0.3%, so the assumption must be plain wrong. Obviously, that's not necessarily the case if we understand the climate to be a finely balanced system particularly vulnerable to "unnatural" interference.
Regardless of whether climate change is anthropogenic, I have yet to see anybody explain exactly what the problem with it is nor has anybody proposed solutions comparable to the affect they believe it will have.
Dave
|
|