UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....
Posted by 'DavyBoy' on 13 Aug 2010 @ 15:13


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
DavyBoy
Joined: July 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
You've not answered either of my questions. I said the vehicle immobilizer on a modern car... not a Cobra on a Scooby ! Can I invite you to hack a 2010 BMW ?
If you'd rather not answer the banking question so be it. Sufficit to say that most people capable of fitting illegal exhaust systems would have difficulty hacking into somebody's bank account.

In terms of the communications topologies, I gave you a few examples... there are others. Dismiss them if you wish, in combination these and others can be made to work.

Not sure what you mean about the costs bit. I didn't know that you've a commercial vested interest in the prevalence of the camera infrastructure but I guess your impassioned advocacy for it now makes sense.

Unless you're privvy to the source code on the vehicle control system, you won't be able to tell me what's necessary to implement such a function on a modern vehicle and consequentially the cost per car.

Message Thread:

We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 17:53)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 18:43)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:06)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:45)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:12)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:21)
Its 2010  by 'DavyBoy'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:29)
Re: Its 2010  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:36)
Re: Its 2010  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 22:03)
The oddest thing is.  by 'AlfieMoon'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 22:06)
Re: The oddest thing is.  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 1:10)
Re: The oddest thing is.  by 'AlfieMoon'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 13:51)
Re: The oddest thing is.  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 16:22)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:59)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'DavyBoy'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 14:17)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'Traxtar'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 15:10)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 16:29)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'DavyBoy'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 18:42)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 18:53)
Re: Its 2010.... RoadRat  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:04)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:58)
Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 8:47)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:13)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 11:46)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:33)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:17)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:31)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 17:53)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 10:42)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:06)
Of COURSE I support the development of limiters  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:53)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:27)
Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 10:55)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:29)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:42)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:56)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:43)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'DavyBoy'  << You are here!
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:17)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:40)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:51)
Re: Itpro  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:01)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:20)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 17:57)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 14:09)
Itpro  by 'davidmc'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 15:00)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 21:10)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:53)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 12:14)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:07)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:32)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'RoadRat'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:06)
RoadRat  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:08)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:13)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:53)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'Traxtar'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 18:10)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 21:15)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:31)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 22:01)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:56)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 11:23)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 20:55)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:14)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:34)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:54)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:45)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:19)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:44)
Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:27)
Re: Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 18:40)
Re: Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 12:25)
Re: Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 21:15)
Paul.....  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:07)
Re: Paul.....  by 'Doink'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 0:11)
Re: Paul.....  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:29)
Re: Paul.....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:47)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:20)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'stevenw'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 1:08)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:30)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:39)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 8:58)
Newshound  by 'stevenw'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:05)
Re: Newshound  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:09)
Re: Newshound  by 'stevenw'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:20)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:49)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:51)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 8:38)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:00)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:07)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 11:18)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 11:44)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Doink'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 12:00)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:34)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 12:25)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:26)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:51)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:01)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 12:02)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 12:19)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:12)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 12:12)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:41)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:48)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:45)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:13)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:40)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:54)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:03)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'buzzinrussell'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:38)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:41)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:47)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:45)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Gillard77'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:36)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:53)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 19:04)
Newshound  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:33)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'buzzinrussell'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 20:54)
Be careful Russ.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 21:24)
Re: Be careful Russ.......  by 'buzzinrussell'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 22:15)
Re: Be careful Russ.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 22:35)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:45)
Firmly touching wood as I type.  by 'RoadRat'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 18:44)
Did I really say that.......  by 'RoadRat'   (14 Aug 2010 @ 7:40)
Re: Did I really say that.......  by 'Doink'   (14 Aug 2010 @ 12:21)
For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 12:36)
Re: For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'Gillard77'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 15:30)
Re: For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'itpro'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 0:05)
Re: For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (19 Aug 2010 @ 7:48)
Gillard  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:29)
Re: Gillard  by 'Gillard77'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:01)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Ok, you two! Hang on...."
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk