UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely
Posted by 'itpro' on 16 Mar 2010 @ 20:16


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
See it from Bridgestone's position. Would YOU want to be the manufacturer of tyres for the PINNACLE of motor-racing that are seen to FAIL after a few laps???? They are doing this for GOOD publicity..... not BAD! How would the public view their tyres if they did that????

Anyway.... look at the REAL problem! We can all see that the REAL cause of the problems has been that the introduction of wings and 'underbody fun' has RUINED close racing! Yes, you can fix some of the symptons by altering many of the peripheral things like tyres, but why NOT cure the CAUSE of the problem. Simply CUT the downforce. Doing that solves MOST of the problems in one go!

Ian

Message Thread:

For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Tmoon'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:10)
Re: For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Traxtar'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:20)
Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:57)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 16:38)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 18:51)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 19:27)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 20:53)
Re: Traction control  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:10)
Re: Traction control  by 'Bod'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:33)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:25)
If advertising space is essential...  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:30)
Re: If advertising space is essential...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:54)
I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:15)
Re: I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:48)
Yes, adds are important, but...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:07)
think of it this way ...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:55)
Re: think of it this way ...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 9:30)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'richpudd2003'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'bertie77'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 13:13)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'rogergreen'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:48)
We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:13)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:49)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:18)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:23)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:47)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:10)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:38)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:57)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:03)
I got it!!!!!!!  by 'Tmoon'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: I got it!!!!!!!  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:39)
Ban them but red bull would be OK  by 'Shanny'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:17)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'davidmc'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:27)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:05)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:11)
300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 23:11)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 13:55)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 15:12)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:52)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:59)
So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not ..  by 'Chads'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 8:02)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'jnrblue91'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 9:37)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 16:39)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 17:44)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:47)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:59)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (23 Mar 2010 @ 2:42)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk