UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely
Posted by 'bertie77' on 16 Mar 2010 @ 12:39


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
bertie77
Joined: May 2007
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
I'm with a ban on Paddle shift, the technology behind them is awesome and now they've finally filtered through to road cars they are getting cheaper, lighter and more reliable.

Would like to see a stick shift reintroduced, along with throttle linkages rather than electronic throttle controls.

And as I typed much earlier in the thread, the air moving through the car should be revisited. Allow more technical freedom to exploit the ground effect and minimise aero elsewhere, less wake, less drag = more overtaking.

Well ...in theory!

Message Thread:

For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Tmoon'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:10)
Re: For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Traxtar'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:20)
Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:57)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 16:38)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 18:51)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 19:27)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 20:53)
Re: Traction control  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:10)
Re: Traction control  by 'Bod'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:33)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:25)
If advertising space is essential...  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:30)
Re: If advertising space is essential...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:54)
I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:15)
Re: I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:48)
Yes, adds are important, but...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:07)
think of it this way ...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:55)
Re: think of it this way ...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 9:30)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'richpudd2003'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'bertie77'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 13:13)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'rogergreen'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:48)
We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:13)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:49)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:18)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:23)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:47)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:10)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:38)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:57)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:03)
I got it!!!!!!!  by 'Tmoon'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: I got it!!!!!!!  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'  << You are here!
Ban them but red bull would be OK  by 'Shanny'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:17)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'davidmc'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:27)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:05)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:16)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:11)
300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 23:11)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 13:55)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 15:12)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:52)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:59)
So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not ..  by 'Chads'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 8:02)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'jnrblue91'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 9:37)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 16:39)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 17:44)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:47)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:59)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (23 Mar 2010 @ 2:42)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk