UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely
Posted by 'DavyBoy' on 16 Mar 2010 @ 11:18


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
DavyBoy
Joined: July 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
The Handford Device is an emergency stop gap. It would only be a matter of time before the teams found a way around it - bearing in mind that there are limitations on how big you can make the Handford Device in relation to the balance of the car.

The F1 aero problem is much greater though. The FIA will need to mandate a complete neutralization in order to cut costs and improve the show. There really is no other way. I agree, they'll have an uphill struggle convincing the teams, many of whom have enormous amounts invested in their aero departments.

Message Thread:

For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Tmoon'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:10)
Re: For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Traxtar'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:20)
Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:57)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 16:38)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 18:51)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 19:27)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 20:53)
Re: Traction control  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:10)
Re: Traction control  by 'Bod'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:33)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:25)
If advertising space is essential...  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:30)
Re: If advertising space is essential...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:54)
I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:15)
Re: I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:48)
Yes, adds are important, but...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:07)
think of it this way ...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:55)
Re: think of it this way ...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 9:30)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'richpudd2003'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'bertie77'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 13:13)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'rogergreen'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:48)
We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:13)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:49)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'  << You are here!
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:23)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:47)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:10)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:38)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:57)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:03)
I got it!!!!!!!  by 'Tmoon'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: I got it!!!!!!!  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:39)
Ban them but red bull would be OK  by 'Shanny'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:17)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'davidmc'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:27)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:05)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:16)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:11)
300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 23:11)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 13:55)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 15:12)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:52)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:59)
So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not ..  by 'Chads'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 8:02)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'jnrblue91'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 9:37)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 16:39)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 17:44)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:47)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:59)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (23 Mar 2010 @ 2:42)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk