UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely
Posted by 'itpro' on 16 Mar 2010 @ 10:13


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
itpro
Joined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]
The top speed would become LUDICROUS! I think a conservative estimate would put the cars in the 300mph range at the end of the Bahrain straight.

200 mph is already too fast but 300 would be VASTLY too fast.... especially with the MASSIVELY reduced downforce which woul;d make emergency braking at 300mph impossible. It would get to the point where, at full speed, the driver couldn't SEE the incident by the time he had arrived at his 'last safe braking point'.

Surely, the answer is much simpler? Cars need to be fitted with some form of 'rear board' whichacts as a 'parachute', ideally, incorporated into the rear wing. I.e., KEEP the rear wing but force the teams to fit a flat-rear to it. This would negate the down force (thus, cornering would NOT be relying upon aerodymanic downforce, thus negating the problem of following a car through corners), and provide a FANTASTIC and HUGE 'hole in the air' which would INCREASE the amount of 'slipstreaming' which is the PERFECT way to increase overtaking!

That solution covers ALL the bases:-

1) Reduced top speed,
2) Reduced Aerodynamic reliance on cornering
3) Reduce the problems if losing down force while followin g a car into the braking/cornering zones
4) INCREASE the braking distance (lower downforce, thus less efficient brakes
5) Increase in available 'slip stream' making overtaking EASIER at higher speeds!

And it even INCREASES the area available for advertising!

It's SUCH a good idea that I wish I had THOUGHT of it....

It's called the "Hanford Device".... see here for further details:-

http://oilpressure.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/is-it-time-for-the-hanford-device/

Ian

Message Thread:

For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Tmoon'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:10)
Re: For the F1 Critics.....  by 'Traxtar'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:20)
Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:57)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 16:38)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 18:51)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 19:27)
Re: Traction control  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 20:53)
Re: Traction control  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:10)
Re: Traction control  by 'Bod'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:33)
Re: Traction control  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:25)
If advertising space is essential...  by 'Chads'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:30)
Re: If advertising space is essential...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:54)
I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:15)
Re: I think you have swollowed the line...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:48)
Yes, adds are important, but...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:07)
think of it this way ...  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:55)
Re: think of it this way ...  by 'Ballhatchet'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 9:30)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'richpudd2003'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'bertie77'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 13:13)
Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..  by 'rogergreen'   (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:48)
We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'  << You are here!
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:49)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:18)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:23)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:47)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:10)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:09)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:38)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'DavyBoy'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:57)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'Doink'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:03)
I got it!!!!!!!  by 'Tmoon'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)
Re: I got it!!!!!!!  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:44)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'bertie77'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:39)
Ban them but red bull would be OK  by 'Shanny'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:17)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'davidmc'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:27)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:05)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:16)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:56)
Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:11)
300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !  by 'Chads'   (16 Mar 2010 @ 23:11)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 13:55)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (17 Mar 2010 @ 15:12)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:52)
Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT!  by 'itpro'   (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:59)
So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not ..  by 'Chads'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 8:02)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'jnrblue91'   (19 Mar 2010 @ 9:37)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 16:39)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 17:44)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:47)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'davidmc'   (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:59)
Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not  by 'itpro'   (23 Mar 2010 @ 2:42)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk