Exactly the same way as I define any other 'reputable scientist':-
One that has papers published and peer-reviewed on that EXACT subject in quality journals.
Now a task for YOU. Find 10 papers published in such quality journals which DON'T suppport Global Warming!
Dave, it really is NOT an argument where there is a 'fine balance' where it is ONLY a matter of subtle interpretation to decide if GW exists! It is UTTERLY OVERWHELMING!
You all seem to forget that I started in the same place as YOU lot! I, too, didn't believe GW was occurring but the absolute AVALANCHE of evidence (when you bother to READ it, please note!) leaves you TOTALLY WITHOUT DOUBT!
I understand that you don't want to read the FULL journals so just go and read a DIGEST... just read New Scientist or Scientific American for 2 or 3 months and you WILL SEE IT!
The ONLY people who are now saying that GW is NOT occurring are those who have NOT read the evidence or do not understand the subject!
Ian
|
|