UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: --- John
Posted by 'TanglerTKM' on 28 Mar 2009 @ 23:16


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
TanglerTKM
Joined: September 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
"When breaking the limit has, by the standards of a sensible assessor, has no significant safety impact, I don't get upset about it."
---But going faster ALWAYS has a significant safety impact. Just 10mph faster can multiply the chances of injury by a significant factor! Your statement is a bit like saying 'if firing a gun straight at someones face has no safety impact, i'm fine with it'. Fair enough, but the fact is it ALWAYS has an impact on safety.


"I am not concerned about legality (the arbitrary nature or the limits makes such concerns spurious) BUT I am bothered about SAFETY."
--- Right, but you aren't concerned enough about safety (or anyone elses safety) so that you stop yourself from going over the speed limit? Do you not think the limit might be there for a reason? Do you not think the limit has been chosen by someone just a tad more qualified to deem an acceptable speed than YOU? What makes you think that you have the right to deliberately increase the risk for you and others (i.e. the person you'd have the accident with).

"Regretably I suspect itpro's and, I fear, your priority is over legality NOT safety."
--- I think you'll find my argument has been entirely based on safety. If you'd actually been taking notice you'd realise I recognise the speed limit as being the LIMIT of acceptable risk, as judged by a proper authority (e.g. NOT a driver who says 'I am a good driver therefore can drive fast') If I had an accident with someone going under the speed limit, I would obviously not be pleased - but (for the speed aspects at least) I will accept that they have limited the risk to other road users to an reasonable level. However, if I have an accident with someone travelling faster than the limit, they have irresponsibly increased the risks beyond what I would regard (and is officially regarded) as a reasonable level. (Note I say 'reasonable' level, and not a 'safe' level)

But go on, be honest, you don't really give a stuff about safety do you John. All you're trying to do is justify in your own head (and in others) why you speed on the roads.

Message Thread:

road safety  by 'kudos'   (11 Mar 2009 @ 23:25)
Re: road safety  by 'kudos'   (11 Mar 2009 @ 23:39)
Re: road safety  by 'itpro'   (11 Mar 2009 @ 23:54)
Re: road safety  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 6:49)
Re: road safety  by 'itpro'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 10:19)
Re: road safety  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 12:52)
Paul......  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 13:39)
Re: Paul......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 8:34)
Re: Paul......  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 10:58)
Re: Paul......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 13:24)
Re: Paul......  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 15:05)
Re: Paul......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 20:00)
Re: road safety  by 'vic'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 8:01)
Re: road safety  by 'itpro'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 10:21)
Re: road safety  by 'JRed'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 11:13)
Re: road safety  by 'ChristianWood'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 16:54)
Christian  by 'itpro'   (13 Mar 2009 @ 18:24)
Re: Christian  by 'ChristianWood'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 3:00)
Re: Christian  by 'DavyBoy'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 14:36)
Re: Christian  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 15:03)
.... failed.....desperate attempts there......  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 13:09)
Re: .... failed.....desperate attempts there......  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 13:48)
Re: .... failed.....desperate attempts there......  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 13:56)
Re: .... failed.....desperate attempts there......  by 'DavidG'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 16:21)
David G......  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 17:31)
Re: David G......  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 18:06)
Rich.....  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 11:06)
Re: Rich.....  by 'richpudd2003'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 14:52)
Re: Rich.....  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 14:59)
Re: Rich.....  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (22 Mar 2009 @ 9:30)
Re: Rich.....  by 'DavidG'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 15:21)
Re: Christian  by 'vic'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 19:14)
Re: Christian  by 'ChristianWood'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 19:32)
Re: Christian  by 'TanglerTKM'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 20:13)
Re: Christian  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (14 Mar 2009 @ 23:24)
Re: Christian  by 'TanglerTKM'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 1:20)
Re: Christian  by 'DavyBoy'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 8:37)
Re: Christian  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 10:39)
Re: Christian  by 'TanglerTKM'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: Christian  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 21:21)
Re: Christian  by 'TanglerTKM'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 22:04)
Re: Christian  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 0:20)
dan,......  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 13:24)
Re: Caught you all with your pants down!!!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 20:47)
Re: Caught you all with your pants down!!!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 23:35)
Re: Caught you all with your pants down!!!  by 'vic'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 7:25)
Re: Caught you all with your pants down!!!  by 'itpro'   (17 Mar 2009 @ 11:14)
Er....  by 'vic'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 6:39)
Re: Christian  by 'vic'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 21:50)
Re: Christian  by 'kudos'   (15 Mar 2009 @ 23:31)
Re: Christian  by 'richpudd2003'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 9:05)
Driver grading  by 'DevonHawker'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 12:32)
Re: Driver grading  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 21:19)
But Christian  by 'itpro'   (16 Mar 2009 @ 13:01)
Re: Christian  by 'JohnClucas'   (28 Mar 2009 @ 20:20)
Re: road safety  by 'kudos'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 22:14)
Re: road safety  by 'kudos'   (12 Mar 2009 @ 22:25)
Re: road safety  by 'JohnClucas'   (25 Mar 2009 @ 22:34)
Re: road safety  by 'TanglerTKM'   (25 Mar 2009 @ 23:26)
Re: road safety  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (26 Mar 2009 @ 2:11)
Re: road safety  by 'JohnClucas'   (26 Mar 2009 @ 19:44)
John  by 'TanglerTKM'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 0:22)
Re: Tangler - I wish  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:01)
Re: Tangler - I wish  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 7:52)
Re: Tangler - I wish  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 9:54)
Re: Tangler - I wish  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 17:04)
John & Dan  by 'TanglerTKM'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 18:35)
Re: Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 19:29)
JOhn  by 'TanglerTKM'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 20:20)
Re: Tangler do read what I write  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 20:32)
Re: John & Dan  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 19:56)
Re: Dan - we ha' loved speed humps  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 19:21)
Tangler.....  by 'itpro'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 20:14)
Re: Tangler.....  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 21:37)
John  by 'itpro'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 23:42)
Re: itpro  by 'JohnClucas'   (28 Mar 2009 @ 13:39)
--- John  by 'TanglerTKM'   (28 Mar 2009 @ 18:29)
Re: --- John  by 'JohnClucas'   (28 Mar 2009 @ 19:17)
Re: --- John  by 'TanglerTKM'  << You are here!
Re: ---Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 19:37)
Re: ---Tangler  by 'TanglerTKM'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:08)
Re: --- Tangler  by 'itpro'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 2:38)
Re: --- Glad you agree with me itpro  by 'JohnClucas'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 20:01)
Speed controls dangerous!  by 'RoadRat'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:04)
Roadrat  by 'TanglerTKM'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:16)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 22:42)
Re: Roadrat  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (30 Mar 2009 @ 8:20)
Re: Dan  by 'TanglerTKM'   (31 Mar 2009 @ 0:01)
Re: Dan  by 'RoadRat'   (31 Mar 2009 @ 8:35)
Re: Dan  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (31 Mar 2009 @ 8:35)
Re: any chance, itpro and tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (31 Mar 2009 @ 20:11)
Re: any chance, itpro and tangler  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (31 Mar 2009 @ 20:46)
Re: any chance, itpro and tangler  by 'TanglerTKM'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 0:31)
Re: tangler - do I take it that you don't believe  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:51)
Tripe... John, complete TRIPE!  by 'itpro'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 19:55)
Re: Tripe... John, complete TRIPE!  by 'JohnClucas'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 20:38)
Re: Tripe... John, complete TRIPE!  by 'itpro'   (27 Mar 2009 @ 23:31)
Re: I wish I had itpro's skills  by 'JohnClucas'   (28 Mar 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: I wish I had itpro's skills  by 'itpro'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 0:56)
Re:Which facts were those?  by 'JohnClucas'   (29 Mar 2009 @ 19:26)
Re:Which facts were those?  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 1:53)
Re But like I said  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:57)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: --- John"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk