"The point is if an accident occurs and the driver is driving at (by the standards of the person assessing the accident) at REASONABLE speed then the cause of the accident, and its consequences is the result of something else."
Well it is true that speed doesn't CAUSE all accidents. So I'd agree with you that the CAUSE of the accident could be the result of something else. However, it doesn't follow that the **consequences** of the accident would be unrelated to speed. In fact, the consequences are very much linked to the speed. (Imagine an accident at 50, then imagine it at 30...big difference!)
Travelling at any speed is a risk, we set a speed limit to limit the risk to an acceptable level (or what you'd call a 'reasonable level'). This acceptable level of risk is frequently ignored by drivers, and thus they are exposing themselves and others to dangers deemed unacceptable for the roads. This is why the speed limit must be enforced, to keep the level of risk in check for everyone. You wouldn't believe how much just going 10mph faster increases the chance of serious injury in an accident.
Other causes of accidents do need to be addressed as well, like drink driving, people driving with mobile phones etc. etc. But they are being addressed. I suspect you only percieve the Police to be solely focusing on Speed because that's the only driving offense you commit. I doubt you drink drive or drive with a mobile phone in your hand...if you did, you may realise how hot the Police are on those things as well.
|
|