As usual, your lack on knowledge lets you down.
Simply go and READ the case of Sharrat and Woods as listed in replies to PaulMRotax.
In there is the PERFECT rebutal of the (PATHETIC) claim that 'speed doesn't kill'! Proving that it DOES is simple beyond BELIEF but IMBECILES keep claiming that it's TRUE!
That claim is about on a par with claims that:-
1) The tooth fairy brings tou sixpence 2) All Toads have jewels in their heads 3) Father Christmas is coming.
We can PROVE it in so many ways but, for simpolicity, the Sharrat/Woods case demonstates that your claim is B*LL*CKS with a SPECIFIC identifiable CASE in which a COMPLETELY innocent person was killed S*O*L*E*L*Y though a driver deciding that HE was 'good' enough to drive ABOVE the speed limit.
Look CLOSELY at the case and find ONE SINGLE THING that was WRONG with his driving EXCEPT that he ASSUMED he was safe to BREAK THE SPEED LIMIT! Had he been AT the speed limit, the accident would NOT have occurred!
Just like YOU.... he TOO thought he was GOD on the road!
I amgine he TOO would have smugly said.... I have ONLY had 5 accidents in 23 years....
I wonder what Miss Woods would have said about his 'skills' if SHE had had the chance......
Ian
|
|