UK Karting - Notice Board (Chat) : Re: nucular testing

Notice Board (Chat)

Re: nucular testing
Posted by 'itpro' on 12 Nov 2008 @ 17:02

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

itproJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]

"satelittes have reported no global increase in temperature over the past 20 years."

Show me where you GOT that evidence!

Also, be a BIT fair to me. I try harder than ANYONE else to EXPLAIN things! I work HARD at it. I never get ANYONE else helping me (or rarely) and then I have to deal with situations like Singers actually cutting and pasting bits of out Phillip Pullman's 'His Dark Materials' trilogy as though they are 'scientific papers'?!?!?! So.... what would YOU do? Treat Singers as SERIOUS?

Being honets, I heard old WOMEN in the STREETS blaming the Nuclear tests for the LOUSY summers we used to get when I was a lad! You have picked a particularly REPEATED one and it's hard to know what IS a serious suggestion and what is a JOKE!

Look at the messages from Canceric! He is hardly on 'my' side but he thinks that the suggestions I am dealing with are SO daft as to be OBVIOUSLY put ther as a 'wind up'!

Did you notice that RoadRat has BOASTED that NO experiment, results, report, findings will EVER persuade him to change his mind? What on EARTH am I supposed to do with THAT! That is EXACTLY the same stance that the Catholic Church took with Galileo..... and look where it got THEM!

I hope I've dealt with you more fairly than with Singers or RoadRat. If not, then I apologise as your recent tone has shown you are MUCH more open to discussion than they are!

Ian

Message Thread:

bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:47)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 9:53)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:27)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:11)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:32)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 10:51)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'davidmc' (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:24)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 11:50)

Re: bias-proof future assessments! by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:23)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 12:55)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:07)

Re: bias-proof future assessments ...continued by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 13:48)

nucular testing by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:18)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (07 Nov 2008 @ 15:32)

Re: nucular testing by 'singers' (07 Nov 2008 @ 16:14)

Re: nucular testing by 'Tmoon' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:17)

Re: nucular testing by 'davidmc' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:06)

Re: nucular testing by 'RoadRat' (07 Nov 2008 @ 17:47)

more evidence by 'singers' (08 Nov 2008 @ 11:54)

Re: more evidence by 'Tmoon' (08 Nov 2008 @ 15:30)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:38)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:50)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 13:22)

Re: nucular testing by 'RoadRat' (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)

Re: nucular testing by 'RoadRat' (11 Nov 2008 @ 15:16)

Hold the front page! by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:05)

Re: Hold the front page! by 'RoadRat' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:45)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:56)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (11 Nov 2008 @ 20:58)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:31)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 2:26)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:08)

By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!! by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:31)

Re: By the way! The word is NUCLEAR!!!! by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:35)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 13:40)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:23)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:27)

Re: nucular testing by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:35)

Re: nucular testing by 'richpudd2003' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:57)

Re: nucular testing by 'itpro' << You are here!

I think this has proved the point by 'Canceric' (08 Nov 2008 @ 22:07)

Re: I think this has proved the point by 'itpro' (11 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)

Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic.. by 'Chad' (11 Nov 2008 @ 22:52)

Re: Ian ...you are like a religeous fanatic.. by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 1:29)

Ian .go and buy a large mirror ... by 'Chad' (12 Nov 2008 @ 5:46)

alternative by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 9:56)

Tmoon by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:26)

Re: Tmoon by 'davidmc' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:41)

David by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:47)

Re: Itpro by 'RoadRat' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:00)

RoadRat by 'itpro' (14 Nov 2008 @ 9:57)

ITPRO by 'RoadRat' (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:17)

Re: ITPRO by 'itpro' (14 Nov 2008 @ 10:25)

Re: Ian .go and buy a large mirror ... by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:10)

Sticks and stones ... by 'Chad' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:16)

That DID make me laugh..... by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 10:30)

cent spill for shot by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 11:17)

concider this by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:08)

try this link by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:15)

Re: concider this by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)

Re: cent spill for shot by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:13)

spilling betta now by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:27)

Re: spilling betta now by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)

Re: spilling betta now by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:15)

this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:20)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:26)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:32)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (12 Nov 2008 @ 14:53)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (12 Nov 2008 @ 17:51)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (13 Nov 2008 @ 10:03)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'Tmoon' (13 Nov 2008 @ 19:17)

Re: this is the link I wanted post by 'itpro' (14 Nov 2008 @ 2:08)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.

This part of the thread has reached the maximum number of replies.
Please reply to one of the other messages within this thread, or if appropriate start a new thread.

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links