I would not think the nucular testing on this planet is substainable, unlike thinderstorms - despite the comparisons of energy output to a thunderstorm, nucular explosions are a great deal more destructive.
If nucular explosions occurred at the same rate as thunderstorms I dont think we'd see christmas 09.
On March 1, 1954, at Bikini Atoll--a curving string of several dozen tiny islands looping gracefully around a 24-mile-long lagoon--the United States tested its first deliverable hydrogen bomb. That test--Bravo--was the most destructive nuclear test in U.S. history. With an explosive force equal to nearly 1,000 Hiroshima-type bombs, it vaporized the test island and parts of two others and left a mile-wide crater in the lagoon floor.
2052 nucular tests have been carried out world wide
some thunderstorm. Im glad I wasnt on that island that day with just me wellies.
Come on - give it some more thought - theres no fun in dismissing a subject that may have a profound effect on our planet, its past and present, its climate, even a small percentage towards aiding to Global climate change. Could it have had a 'measured' effect on our planet?
|
|