Remember, if you CONTINUE to refuse to answer the question, the 'rules' of 'Rhetoric' mean that you HAVE accepted it's implicit points!
However...
I simply CANNOT see how what you are saying in that reply DENIES that we SHOULD cut our consumption of fossil fuels while there is a CHANCE that continueing to be profligate might ANIHILATE us!
I am NOT denying that population numbers IS the cause but I also state that cutting the OUTPUT of each person is BETTER than KILLING a VAST number so that the 'survivors' can carry on WASTING our fossil fuels!
But that is NOT the point under discussion! We need to agree if we should do SOMETHING! The exact ACTION we take comes after the decision that we SHOULD do something!
The 'discussion' still centres on whether we should do SOMETHING while we SUSPECT we MIGHT be doing something L*E*T*H*A*L!
So, tell us YOUR advice to the potential Cirrhosis patient!
Ian
|
|