I am glad YOU are not my solicitor! But, perhaps you ARE one and that explains why you don't bother to READ before you answer!
Note what Hulacki said in his FIRST comment:-
"....am not just going to come on here a blame others. for starters i am not going to point any fingers and blame anyone (yet). therefore im not going to say which engine it is until we have proved it wasn’t us that have touched the engine by showing that none of our seals have been tampered with."
The implication is PLAIN: he feels that he BOUGHT the motor AFTER it was 'tampered with'. Thus he, VERY wisely, is NOT going to name names until he feels SAFE doing so (if ever). He clearly wants us to feel that naming names BEFORE he can 'prove' the matter WOULD put him at further risk. Not only that but any sane person would notice that OTHER readers have assumed that implication WITHOUT it being NAMED!
The 'accused' person would be EXPECTED to suffer a reduction in their credibility as a vendor (which is EXACTLY what the likes of Graham and others have implied), and, if they could show that the named person had LOST sales, unfairly, then the named person have GOOD grounds to pursue a case for damages!
However, you clearly feel that you DO know what you are talking about. So..... if you feel SO sure that it is 'safe' to publish the name, then ASK Hulacki, in private, giving him WRITTEN ASSURANCES that YOU will underwrite any damages caused by publication and THEN PUBLISH it!
Let's see how brave YOU are when it's YOUR money and not some else's!
What am I offered as a bet that you WON'T put your MONEY where YOUR mouth is?
Ian
|
|