"if it calibrates more than one point to be correct im pretty sure it is more accurate" - only PRETTY SURE?
I agree in principle, but in practical terms (the way you are suggesting) I don't think this is viable. By the time you have done this at the track, you've missed the moment.
Please tell me how you would go about this at the track? If you are continually refining your "reference point" on the JetTec software it's surely a similar thing.
If you use multiple points of calibration then ALL of them have to be correct or you pollute the correct points, is this not effectively the SAME as having 1 correct point? I recognise that with more points of calibration you can get closer to a 100% perfect calibration setting, but you can also introduce results away from what might have been already a 100% perfect calibration point. Either way your knackered in that case.
Weren't you moaning about young Russels starting technique?
I haven't said any of your advice was misleading.
I'm curious in your method of jet setting with this multi reference point technique?
As said previously I used to set mine without ANY aids, no thermometer, barometer jetting software etc etc, and did well enough at club and national level, its all down to the mug using the tools available to them correctly. If the person setting the gear up is a muppet in the first place, then it doesn't matter what method they use.
|
|